-
Travush Vladimir Il'ich -
Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, member, Vise-president, Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences, 24 Bol'shaya Dmitrovka st., Moscow, 107031, Russian Federation;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
-
Volkov Yuriy Sergeevich -
Scientific and Research, design-and-engineering and Technological Institute of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Named after Gvozdev A.A. (NIIZhB)
Candidate of Technical Sciences, advisor, Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences, Scientific and Research, design-and-engineering and Technological Institute of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Named after Gvozdev A.A. (NIIZhB), 6, 2 Institutskaya st., Moscow, 109428, Russian Federation;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
A complex of problems is not solved in technical regulation of construction. This includes the list of regulatory documents of compulsory application is not revised yet. The issue of developing high-quality regulative documents for the construction field is of great importance, because their fulfillment guarantees the safety of the population. The project of this list consists of 76 documents; that’s 15 less, than in the existing list. The reasons for reducing the number of documents are doubtful. In the list project there are no standards for building materials. All the documents concerning the rules of work execution are also out of this list, though the documents affecting the building safety should be included it the compulsory list. It is offered not to make a list of documents. It is enough to enumerate all the reference documents in project documentation, which is subject to inspection by the building supervision agencies as compulsory. There will be no need for the additional list of documents for optional application.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.3.7-14
References
- Federal'nyy zakon «O tekhnicheskom regulirovanii» ot 27.12.2002 ¹ 184-FZ [Federal Law “On Technical Regulations” from 27.12.2002 # 184-FZ]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/popular/techreg. Date of access: 12.01.2014.
- Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya «Tekhnicheskoe regulirovanie v stroitel'stve» [International Conference “Technical Regulations in Construction”]. BST: byulleten' stroitel'noy tekhniki [Bulletin of Building Technology]. 2013, no. 12, pp. 45—48.
- Federal'nyy zakon ot 30.12.2009 ¹ 384-FZ «Tekhnicheskiy reglament o bezopasnosti zdaniy i sooruzheniy» [Federal Law from 30.12.2009 # 384-FZ “Technical Regulations for the Security of Buildings and Structures]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/popular/techreg. Date of access: 12.01.2014.
- Proekt perechnya norm, v rezul'tate primeneniya kotorykh na obyazatel'noy osnove obespechivaetsya vypolnenie trebovaniy Tekhnicheskogo reglamenta «O bezopasnosti zdaniy i sooruzheniy» [The Project of the List of Regularities, Application of Which on Compulsory Basis Ensures Fulfi llment of the Requirements of Technical Regulations “On the Security of Buildings and Structures]. Available at: http://www.nop.ru/. Date of access: 12.01.2014.
-
Deryushev Leonid Georgiyevich -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associated Professor, Department of Water Supply, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
-
Pham Ha Hai -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
postgraduate student, Department of Water Supply, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
The recommendations for the development of additional regulatory requirements to reliability of water supply systems in Vietnam are offered. In current construction rules for design, the reliability of water supply systems of water facilities is not standardized. Water systems are classified into three categories, for which the conditions for performing functions in the process of water supply for consumers are formulated. It is not provided to assess the quality of these functions quantitatively. Adoption of design decisions without quantitative assessment of their quality is violating a systematic approach in carrying out construction and design works, which has formed in the global practice. As a result of the research of water supply facilities’ reliability in Vietnam and Russia, the reliability of the existing water supply facilities has been estimated. On the basis of mathematical methods for assessing the reliability of technical objects, the methods for assessing the reliability of water supply facilities and their systems has been justified and systematized. If there is lack of reliability and security requirements to the object of capital construction for design documentation development or such requirements are not established, the development and approval in the prescribed manner of special specifications should precede the documentation development. It is proposed to systematize the statistical data gathering on the reliability of the equipment and facilities of water supply systems by uniform rules. Any designed objects of water supply must have a quantitative estimate of the level of reliability. The outlined methods for assessing the reliability of water supply facilities and systems can be used in the formation of regulatory requirements for reliability in the design of water supply facilities in Vietnam.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.9.7-21
References
- GOST 27.002—89. Nadezhnost' v tekhnike. Osnovnye ponyatiya. Terminy i opredeleniya [All-Union State Standard GOST 27.002—89. Reliability of Equipment. Basic Concepts. Terms and Definitions]. Nadezhnost' v tekhnike : sbornik GOSTov [Reliability of Equipment : Collection of All-Union State Standards]. Moscow, Publishing and Printing Complex «Izdatel'stvo standartov», 2002, pp. 9—32.
- GOST R 53480—2009. Nadezhnost' v tekhnike. Terminy i opredeleniya [All-Union State Standard GOST R 53480—2009. Reliability of Equipment. Terms and Definitions]. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2010, 32 p.
- Barlow R.E., Proschan F. Mathematical Theory of Reliability (Classics in Applied Mathematics). 1987, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 274 p.
- Bazovskiy I. Nadezhnost'. Teoriya i praktika [Reliability. Theory and Practice]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1965, 374 p.
- Solov'ev A.D. Osnovy matematicheskoy teorii nadezhnosti [Fundamentals of Mathematical Reliability Theory]. Moscow, Znanie Publ., 1975, 103 p.
- Deryushev L.G., Minaev A.V. Otsenka nadezhnosti sistem vodosnabzheniya [Reliability Estimation for Water Supply Systems]. Vodosnabzhenie i sanitarnaya tekhnika [Water Supply and Sanitary Engineering]. 1988, no. 11, pp. 4—5.
- Deryushev L.G. Pokazateli nadezhnosti truboprovodnykh sistem vodosnabzheniya i vodootvedeniya [Reliability Indicators of Water Supply and Water Disposal Pipeline Systems]. Vodosnabzhenie i sanitarnaya tekhnika [Water Supply and Sanitary Engineering]. 2000, no.12, pp. 6—9.
- Gnedenko B.V., Belyaev Yu.K., Solov'ev A.D. Matematicheskie metody v teorii nadezhnosti [Mathematical Methods in Reliability Theory]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1965, 524 p.
- Primin O.G., Klimiashvili L.D. Metodika sbora i obrabotki statisticheskikh dannykh po otkazam otdel'nykh elementov sistemy podachi i raspredeleniya vody [Methods of Gathering and Processing Statistical Data on Separate Components Failure of Water Supply and Distribution System]. Voprosy nadezhnosti sistem vodosnabzheniya : sbornik trudov MISI [Problems of Reliability of Water Supply Systems : Collection of Works of Moscow Construction Engineering Institute]. Moscow, MISI Publ., 1978, no. 170, pp. 82—94.
- Primin O.G., Moiseev V.N. Opredelenie ob"emov vremennogo rezervirovaniya v rayonnykh sistemakh vodosnabzheniya s uchetom potoka otkazov ee elementov [Determination of Time Reservation Volume in Regional Water Supply Systems with Account for its Components Failure Flow]. Sovershenstvovanie sistem vodosnabzheniya g. Moskvy [Improving Water Supply Systems in Moscow]. Moscow, MVNIIproekt Publ., 1984, pp. 23—25.
- Herz R.K. Protsess stareniya i neobkhodimost' vosstanovleniya vodoprovodnykh setey [Ageing Processes and Need for Rehabilitation of Drinking Water Distribution Networks]. AKVA Publ., 1996, no. 9.
- Haviland R. Engineering Reliability and Long Life Design. D. Von Nostrand Co., Inc., New Jersey, 1964.
- Krutsenyuk I.Yu. Matematicheskaya model' prognozirovaniya kolichestvennykh kharakteristik protsessov funktsionirovaniya sistem vodosnabzheniya [Mathematical Prediction Model of Quantitative Characteristics of the Functioning Processes of Water Supply Systems]. Tezisy dokladov 61-y nauchno-tekhnicheskoy konferentsii [Paper Abstracts of the 61st Science and Technical Conference]. Novosibirsk, NGASU Publ., 2004, p. 122.
- Der Kiureghian A., Song J. Multi-scale Reliability Analysis and Updating of Complex Systems by Use of Linear Programming. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2008, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 288—297. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.022.
- Subramanian R., Anantharaman V. Reliability Analysis of a Complex Standby Redundant System. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 1995, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 57—70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(94)00073-W.
- Ostfeld A. Reliability Analysis of Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Hydroinformatics. 2004, no. 6, pp. 281—294.
-
Deryushev Leonid Georgievich -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Water Supply, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; +7 (499) 183-36-29;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
-
Deryusheva Nadezhda Leonidovna -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
postgraduate student, Department of Water Disposal and Aquatic Ecology, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; +7 (499) 183-36-29;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
-
Pham Ha Hai -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
postgraduate student, Department of Water Supply, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
In the article the requirements for fire safety assurance are justified for the objects, in which water is supplied with account for serial and parallel area zoning. In the process of zoning the district is segregated into such parts, for which head rate in any point of selection of water from network will not exceed 6 bar. In the current regulatory rules the requirements for the calculation of the costs of water points are stated, as well as in case of extinguishing fires at the sites with water-supply systems zones. It is recommended to analyze each zone of the system of water-supply separately, without interrelation with the common water feeders, water consumers and services of fire extinguishing. Such an approach to assign water discharge for fire extinguishing results in the decrease of fire safety of an object, deforms calculation technique of outside systems of water-supply of the similar-type objects located in different parts of the terrain. Taking the number of fires and water consumption for fire suppression by the number of residents in each zone, we thus underestimate the capacity of the pipeline system. It is offered to make changes in Norms and Standards in force on fire safety of settlements. The recommendations on regulation of the number of fires and water flow for fire fighting in residential objects with zoned systems of water-supply are formulated.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.11.7-13
References
- Postanovleniya Pravitel’stva RF ot 16 fevralya 2008 g. ¹ 87 «O sostave razdelov proektnoy dokumentatsii i trebovaniy k ikh soderzhaniyu (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) [RF Government Regulation from February, 16, 2008 no. 87 “On Composition of Design Documentation Sections and Requirements to Their Contents (amended and revised)]. Garant : informatsionno-pravovoy portal [Garant: Legislation with Comments]. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/12158997/. Date of access: 22.10.2014. (In Russian).
- Federal’nyy zakon ot 22 iyulya 2008 g. ¹ 123-FZ. «Tekhnicheskiy reglament o trebovaniyakh pozharnoy bezopasnost» [Federal Law fron July 22, 2008 no. 123-FZ 2 “Technical Regulations on Fire Safety Requirements”]. Nezavisimaya stroitel’naya ekspertiza [Independent Construction Examination]. Available at: http://files.stroyinf.ru/Data1/53/53446/. Date of access: 22.10.2014. (In Russian).
- Zhuchkov V.V., Khorev D.V., Vasil’ev D.V. Normirovanie raskhoda vody na pozharotushenie v g. Moskve [Norms of Water Flow for Fire-Fighting in Moscow]. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti [Safety Technologies in Technosphere]. 2013, no. 3 (49). Available at: http://academygps.ru/img/UNK/asit/ttb/2013-3/21-03-13.ttb.pdf/. Date of access: 22.10.2014. (In Russian).
- Brushlinskiy N.N. Sistemnyy analiz deyatel’nosti Gosudarstvennoy protivopozharnoy sluzhby [System Analysis of State Fire-Fighting Service]. Moscow, MIPB MVD RF, «Yuniks» Publ., 1998, 255 p. (In Russian).
- Belozerov V.V., Boguslavskiy E.I., Topol'skiy N.G. Model' optimizatsii sotsial›noekonomicheskikh poter' ot pozharov [Optimization Model of Social and Economic Losses as a Result of Fires]. Problemy informatsionnoy ekonomiki. Vypusk VI. Modelirovanie innovatsionnykh protsessov i ekonomicheskoy dinamiki: sbornik nauchykh trudov [Information Economy Problems. Issue 6. Modeling of Information Processes and Economical Dynamics: Collection of Scientific Articles]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2006, pp. 226—246. (In Russian).
- Terebnev V.V. Spravochnik rukovoditelya tusheniya pozhara [Guidebook for Manager of Fire Extinguishing]. Moscow, Akademiya GPS MChS RF Publ., 2005, 256 p. (In Russian).
- Baranov P.P., Belozerov V.V., Vorovich I.I., Kuraev G.A., Panich A.E., Trufanov V.N., Topol’skiy N.G. Metodologiya otsenki i upravleniya bezopasnost’yu tekhnosfery [Estimation and Management Methodology for Fire Safety in Technosphere]. Tekhnosfernaya bezopasnost’ : sbornik materialov VII Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Technosphere Safety : Collection of the Works of the VII All-Russian Science and Practice Conference]. Rostov on Don, YuRO RAASN (RGSU) Publ., 2002, pp. 67—73. (In Russian).
- Brushlinskiy H.H., Vagner P., Sokolov C.B., Kholl D. Mirovaya pozharnaya statistika [World Fire Statistics]. Moscow, AGPS MChS Rossii Publ., 2004, 126 p. (In Russian).
- Men’shikh A.V. Obosnovanie obshchego vida avtoregressionnoy modeli dinamiki pozharov [General View Justification for Autoregressive Model of Fire Dynamics]. Chelovek. Priroda. Obshchestvo. Aktual’nye problemy : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy molodezhnoy konferentsii [Human. Nature. Society. Current Problems : Materials of the International Youth Conference]. Voronezh, Nauchnaya kniga Publ., 2012, pp. 68—70. (In Russian).
- Trostyanskiy S.N., Shutkin A.N., Bakaeva G.A. Ekonomicheskiy podkhod k prognozirovaniyu pozharnykh riskov na ob”ektakh razlichnykh form sobstvennosti [Economical Approach to Fire Risks Forecast on the Objects of Different Ownership Types]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta GPS MChS Rossii [Proceedings of Voronezh Institute of State Fire Safety Service of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia]. 2011, no. 1, pp. 27—29. (In Russian).
- Hutson A.C. Water Works Requirements for Fire Protection. Journal of the American Water Works Association. 1948, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 936—940.
- Davis S.K. Fire Fighting Water: A Review of Fire Fighting Water Requirements. A New Zealand Perspective. Fire Engineering Research Report 2000/3, 2000, 110 p.
- Benfer M.E., Scheffey J.L. Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies. Fire Protection Research Foundation, January 2014, 57 p.
- Hadjisophocleous G.V., Richardson J.K. Water Flow Demands for Firefighting. Fire Technology. Manufactured in The United States, July 2005, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 173—191. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10694-005-1269-6.
- American Water Works Association. Distribution System Requirements for Fire Protection. Denver, CO : American Water Works Association, 1998, 63 p.
- Abramov N.N. Nadezhnost’ sistem vodosnabzheniya [Reliability of Water Supply Systems]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1979, 231 p. (In Russian).
- Il’in Yu.A. Raschet nadezhnosti podachi vody [Reliability Calculation of Water Supply]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1987, 320 p. (In Russian).
- Gnedenko B.V., Belyaev Yu.K., Solov’ev A.D. Matematicheskie metody v teorii nadezhnosti [Mathematical Methods in Reliability Theory]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1965, 524 p. (In Russian).
- Barlow R.E., Proschan F. Mathematical Theory of Reliability (Classics in Applied Mathematics). 1987, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 274 p.
- Bazovsky I. Reliability Theory and Practice (Dover Civil and Mechanical Engineering). Dover Publications, 2004, 304 p.
-
Spehl Pierre -
SECO; Université libre de Bruxelles; Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées
senior civil engineer Honorary Professor; +32 (0) 2 238-22-11, SECO; Université libre de Bruxelles; Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, Rue d’Arlon, 53, B-1040, Brussels, Belgium; Avenue Franklin Roosevelt 50, 1050, Brussels, Belgium; 6-8 Avenue Blaise Pascal, Cité Descartes, 77455, Champs-sur-Marne Marne la Vallée cedex 2, France;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
The paper gives an overview of the evolution of the construction sector within the European unification process and explains the reasons why this evolution happened, how it was organized and lived, and where it is leading. The links between the main stages of this process and the European legislation specific to the construction sector are presented, and the main prescriptions of the Construction Products Directive are reviewed. The need to express the characteristics of products in terms of performance is emphasized and data are given on the CEN program of harmonized product standards, test methods and calculation methods standards. The CEN standards on construction works such as the EUROCODES are also presented, its impact on existing regulatory systems is discussed and some conclusions are drawn on the added value of the European input to the construction sector.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2013.1.7-18
References
- Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988. On the Approximation of Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Relating to Construction
Products. Official Journal of the European Union, L 40, 11 February 1989, p. 12.
- Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonized conditions for the marketing of construction products
and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 88, 4 April 2011, p. 5.
- Judgment of the Court of 20 February 1979, Case 120/78, European Court reports 1979, p. 00649.
- www.bbri.be EU legislation, Construction Products Directive, CE Marking, Services.
- Joint RILEM-ASTM-CIB Symposium “Performance Concept in Buildings”. Proceedings, NBS SPECIAL PUBLICATION 361, 2 vol., 1972.
- www.seco.be
- R. d’Hav? & P. Spehl. Guide des Performances du B?timent, Syndicat d’Etudes IC-IB. Brussels, 1980, 9 vol.
- ISO 6241 “Performance Standards in Building — Principles for Their Preparation and Factors to Be Considered”. Geneva, 1984.
- ISO/IEC Guide 2. Standardization and Related Activities. General Vocabulary, ISO, Geneva, 2004.
- Directive 2002/91/EC of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, Official Journal of the European Union, L 001 , 04/01/2003 p. 0065–0071.
- Regulation (EC) no.1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).
- Jean Monnet. Memoirs. London, 1978.
-
Madatyan Sergey Ashotovich -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Department of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Structures, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 129337, г. Москва, Ярославское шоссе, д. 26;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
Reinforced concrete is uninterruptedly developing progressive type of building materials. One of the most important advantages of reinforced concrete is the possibility of using it with reinforcing steel or composite materials of increased and high strength.As a result occurs substantial permanent growth in production, increase in strength and other service characteristics of steel rolling used for reinforcing concrete.Production and application of the modern types of reinforcement in our country started not long ago, much later, than in the USA and European countries. Until 1950 deformed reinforcement was not produced and used in our country; the production of hot-rolling reinforcement of the A400 (A-III) class started only in 1956.But already in 1960 the application of this reinforcement was 1.0 million tons a year, and in 1970 — 3.4 million tons a year.Up to the year 2012, the production and application of the deformed reinforcement of the classes A-400, A-500C and A-600C of all kinds exceeded 8.0 million tons. In order to ensure economic efficiency and competitive ability of national construction, the process of increasing the strength and workability of domestic reinforcing bar is continuously taking place. The results of this process in respect of the common untensioned reinforcement of reinforced concrete structures are discussed in the present article.We suggest to consider the mechanical and service characteristics of deformed reinforcement, which is manufactured according to the standards of our country GOST P 52544, classes A500C and B500C, GOST 5781, class A400, and Technical specifications 14-1-5596—2010, class Ан600С, grade 20Г2СФБA.For the comparative analysis we use the standard data for similar reinforcement established by EN 10080-2005 and Eurocode 2, as well as by standards ÖNORM B-420 of Austria, BC 4449/2005 of Great Britain, DIN 488 of Germany, A706M of the USA and G3142 of Japan.The standards of the above-mentioned countries slightly differ from the standardsEN 10080 and Eurocode 2, and from the Russian standards.We consider the statistical data of the real properties of hot-rolling, coldolling and thermo mechanically strengthened deformed reinforcement manufactured and certified according to GOST R 52544 and GOST 5781, produced in Russia, Byelorussia, Moldavia, Latvia, Poland, Turkey and Egypt.The fundamental difference of modern European standards from Russian standards and the standards of other countries considered in this article is that the requirements of EN 10080 and Eurocode 2 are unified for all reinforcement with the yield point of 400 to600 H/mm2 regardless of its production method.At the same time it is stated, that the actual properties of reinforcement of all groups according to EN 10080, differ essentially from those specified by this Standard and they better correspond to the Russian, Austrian and German standards.The Standard EN 10080 in the version of the year 2005 is inconvenient, because it does not determine technical classes. As a result, many European countries use their own, but not the European standards.Conclusion.The comparative analysis of our national and foreign standards of deformed rolled steel used for reinforcing concrete demonstrates that the physical and mechanical properties of the Russian and European reinforcing steel are almost the same, but for the following facts:Standard requirements established according to GOST 5781, GOST 10884 andGOST R 52544 are a bit higher than the standards of EN 10080;Reinforcement of the classes A400, A500 B500C and A600C, manufactured according to the Russian standards, can be used without recounting instead of reinforcement of the same strength classes according to EN 10080 and to the standards of other countries all over the world.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2013.11.7-18
References
- Svod pravil SP 63.13330—2012. Betonnye i zhelezobetonnye konstruktsii. Osnovnye polozheniya [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures. Fundamental Principles]. Aktualizirovannaya redaktsiya SNiP 52-01—2003 [Revised Edition of Building Requirements 52-01—2003]. Moscow, NIIZhB Publ., 2012, 153 p.
- GOST R 52544—2006. Prokat armaturnyy svarivaemyy periodicheskogo profilya klassov A500S i V500S dlya armirovaniya zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsiy. Tekhnicheskie usloviya [All-Union Standard R 52544—2006. Deformed Weld Reinforcing Bar of the Classes A500S and V500S for Reinforcing of Concrete Structures. Technical Specifications]. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2006, 20 p.
- Eurocode 2. Design of Concrete Structures — Part 1-1 General Rules and Rules for Buildings. EN 1992-1-1. December 2004, 225 p.
- Almazov V.O. Proektirovanie zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsiy po evronormam [Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures According to European Requirements]. Moscow, ASV Publ., 2007, 216 p.
- Riskind B.Ya. Prochnost' szhatykh zhelezobetonnykh stoek s termicheski uprochnennoy armaturoy [Strength of Compressed Reinforced Concrete Columns with Thermally Strengthened Reinforcement]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 1972, no. 11, p. 31—33.
- Chistyakov E.A., Mulin N.M., Khait I.G. Vysokoprochnaya armatura v kolonnakh [High-tensile Reinforcement in Columns]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 1979, no. 8, pp. 20—21.
- Madatyan S.A. Tekhnologiya natyazheniya armatury i nesushchaya sposobnost' zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsiy [The Technology of Steel Tensioning and Load-bearing Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Structures]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1980, 196 p.
- DIN 1045. Beton und Stahlbeton. Berlin. 1988, 84 p.
- EN 10080. Weldable reinforcing steel — General. May 2005, 75 p.
- ?NORM 4200. Teil 7. Stahlbetontragwerke. Verst?rkung f?r Beton. OIB-691-002/04, 25 p.
- BS 4449:2005. Steel for the Reinforcement of Concrete – Weldable reinforcing Steel – Bar, Coil and Decoiled Product – Specification. 2005, 36 p.
- Madatyan S.A. Armatura zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsiy [Reinforcement of Concrete Structures]. Moscow, Voentekhlit Publ., 2000, 236 p.
-
Moyseychik Evgeniy Alekseevich -
Novosibirsk State Universityof Architecture and Civil Engineering (NSUACE (Sibstrin))
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Doctoral Student, Department of Metal and Wooden Structures, Novosibirsk State Universityof Architecture and Civil Engineering (NSUACE (Sibstrin)), 113 Leningradskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630008, Russian Federation;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
The complex program of harmonization of Russian and European systems of technical rate setting in construction presupposes the translation of Eurocode texts to Russian language, their adaptation for use on the Russian territory and creation of terminological dictionaries, which includes dictionaries on metal construction. In the article the author gives examples of inappropriate Russian terms introduced in the process of translation from foreign languages. For the concepts denoted by the proposed terms, there already exist established normative documents, which have passed all the terminological procedure and are introduced in State Standards and regulations. The author demonstrates contradictions and formulates the basic terms, showing the ground state of modern science and engineering practice of cold-resistant steel structures. The basic requirements for the development of quality in construction terminology are stated. Scientific, research, methodic, organizational work on construction databases creation should be executed on minimum two languages: English and Russian before developing terminological standards in the construction sphere. Normative terminological dictionaries, collections of scientific-normative and technical-normative terminology, dictionaries and reference works are the sources for construction databases. Scientific technical translation should undergo qualified scientific editing.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.8.7-19
References
- Dobrovidov A.H. Kholodnolomkost' stali [Cold Shortness of Steel]. Izvestiya TPU [Bulletin of Tomsk Polytechnic University]. 2003, vol. 306, no. 7, pp. 139—164.
- Shevandin E.M., Razov I.D. Khladnolomkost' i predel'naya plastichnost' metallov v sudostroenii [Cold Shortness and Limit Plasticity of Metals in Ship Building]. Leningrad, Sudostroenie Publ., 1965, 336 p.
- Vinokurov V.A., Larionov V.P. Osnovnye napravleniya i perspektivy issledovaniy po obespecheniyu khladostoykosti svarnykh soedineniy [Main Directions and Prospects of Investigations on Providing Cold Resistance of Weld Seams]. Rabotosposobnost' mashin i konstruktsiy v usloviyakh nizkikh temperatur. Khladostoykost' materialov: sbornik dokladov Vsesoyuznoy nauchno-tekhnicheskoy konferentsii. Chast '. 2: Prochnost' metallov i svarnykh konstruktsiy [Workability of Machines and Structures in Low Temperature Conditions. Cold Resistance of Materials: Collection of Papers of All-Union Scientific and Technical Conference. Part 2: Durability of Materials and Welded Constructions]. Yakutsk, YaF SO AN SSSR Publ., 1974, pp. 3—18.
- Larionov V.P., Kuz'min V.R., Sleptsov O.I., Lepov V.V. Khladostoykost' materialov i elementov konstruktsiy: rezul'taty i perspektivy [Cold Resistance of Materials and Construction Elements: Results and Prospects]. IFTPS SO RAN, Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2005, 290 p.
- Odesskiy P.D. O razvitii metodiki otsenki khladostoykosti konstruktsiy s uchetom konstruktivno-tekhnologicheskikh faktorov i usloviy ekspluatatsii [On the Development of Evaluation Methods for Construction Cold Resistance with Account for Constructive and Technological Factors and Operation Conditions]. Stroitel'naya mekhanika i raschet sooruzheniy [Structural Mechanics and Structural Analysis]. 1992, no. 3, pp. 76—83.
- Gorpinchenko V.M., Starikov V.A. Otsenka khladostoykosti elementov boltovykh soedineniy iz malouglerodistykh staley [Evaluation of Cold Resistant Elements of Bolted Connections Made of Mild Steel]. Novye formy i prochnost' metallicheskikh konstruktsiy: trudy TsNIISK im. V.A. Kucherenko [New Forms and Durability of Metal Structures: Works of Central Scientific and Research Institute of Building Constructions Named after V.A. Kucherenko]. Moscow, TsNIISK Publ., 1989, pp. 244—254.
- Sil'vestrov A.V. Povyshenie nadezhnosti stal'nykh konstruktsiy, podverzhennykh vozdeystviyu nizkikh estestvennykh temperatur : dissertatsiya doktora tekhnicheskikh nauk [Raising Durability of Steel Structures Subject to Low Natural Temperatures’ Affect: Doctor of Technical Sciences Thesis]. Novosibirsk, NISI Publ., 1974, 432 p.
- Shafray S.D. Khladostoykost' stal'nykh konstruktsiy i deformatsionnye kriterii ee otsenki : avtoreferat dissertatsii doktora tekhnicheskikh nauk [Cold Resistance of Steel Structures and Deformational Criteria of its Evaluation: Author’s Abstract of Doctor of Technical Sciences Thesis]. Moscow, TsNIISK im. V.A. Kucherenko Publ., 1999, 46 p.
- Streletskiy N.S., Baldin V.A. Uchet sklonnosti k khrupkomu razrusheniyu stali v raschetakh konstruktsiy [Account for Steel Tendency for Brittle Failure in Structure Analisis]. Vtoraya vsesoyuznaya konferentsiya po khladostoykosti svarnykh konstruktsiy : tezisy dokladov [Second All-Union Conference Cold Resistance of Welded Constructions: Report Theses]. Kiev, IES im. E.O. Patona Publ., 1965, pp. 27—30.
- Shevernitskiy V.V., Zhemchuzhnikov G.V. K voprosu o khrupkom razrushenii svarnykh metallokonstruktsiy [To the Oroblem of Brittle Failure of Welded Metal Structures]. Avtomaticheskaya svarka [Automatic Welding]. 1955, no. 6, pp. 19—29.
- Sakhnovskiy M.M., Titov A.M. Uroki avariy stal'nykh konstruktsiy [Lessons of Steel Structures’ Accidents]. Kiev, Budivel'nik Publ., 1969, 200 p.
- Odesskiy P.D., Vedyakov I.I., Gorpinchenko V.M. Predotvrashchenie khrupkikh razrusheniy metallicheskikh stroitel'nykh konstruktsiy [Prevention of Massive Distructions of Metal Building Constructions]. Moscow, SP «Intermet inzhiniring» Publ., 1998, 219 p.
- Shafray S.D. Povyshenie khrupkoy prochnosti stal'nykh konstruktsiy pri nizkikh temperaturakh [Raising Brittle Fracture of Steel Structures in Low Temperatures]. Novosibirsk, NISI Publ., 1989, 88 p.
- Biryulev V.V., Koshin I.I., Krylov I.I., Sil'vestrov A.V. Proektirovanie metallicheskikh konstruktsiy [Metal Structures Design]. Leningrad, Stroyizdat Publ., 1990, 432 p.
- Belyaev B.I., Kornienko V.S. Prichiny avariy stal'nykh konstruktsiy i sposoby ikh ustraneniya [Reasons for Accidents of Metal Structures and Ways of their Elimination]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1968, 206 p.
- Lashchenko M.N. Avarii metallicheskikh konstruktsiy zdaniy i sooruzheniy [Accidents of Metal Constructions of Buildings and Structures]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1969, 183 p.
- Kishkin B.P. Konstruktsionnaya prochnost' materialov [Constructive Strength of Materials]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1967, 184 p.
- Moskvichev V.V. Osnovy konstruktsionnoy prochnosti tekhnicheskikh sistem i inzhenernykh sooruzheniy [Fundamentals of Constructive Strength of Technical Systems and Engineering Structures]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2002, 106 p.
- Chuvikovskiy V.S. Konstruktivno-tekhnologicheskaya prochnost' i obespechenie nadezhnosti korpusnykh konstruktsiy [Constructive and Technological Strength and Reliability of Hull Structures]. Sudostroenie [Ship Building]. 1978, no. 8, pp. 3—5.
- Kudishin Yu.I., Belenya E.I., Ignat'eva V.S. Metallicheskie konstruktsii [Metal Structures]. 11th edition, Moscow, ITs «Akademiya» Publ., 2008, 688 p.
- Shevernitskiy V.V., Novikov V.I., Zhemchuzhnikov G.V., Trufyakov V.I. Staticheskaya prochnost' svarnykh soedineniy iz malouglerodistoy stali [Static Strength of Welded Seams Made of Wild Steel]. Kiev, AN USSR Publ., 1951, 87 p.
- Kratkoe metodicheskoe posobie po razrabotke i uporyadocheniyu nauchno-tekhnicheskoy terminologii [Short Manual on Development and Improvement of Scientific Technical Terminology]. AN SSSR, KNTT, Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979, 127 p.
- Terminologicheskiy slovar' dlya natsional'nykh normativnykh dokumentov realizuyushchikh Evrokody [Terminological Dictionary for National Normative Documents Implementing Eurocodes]. Moscow, TsNIIPSK im.Mel'nikova Publ., 2014, 208 p.
- MGSN 53-01—2013. Stal'nye konstruktsii i izdeliya. Mezhgosudarstvennye stroitel'nye normy (proekt) [MGSN 53-01—2013.Steel Structures and Products. Interstate Construction Norms (Project)]. Available at: http://www.certif.org/MNTKS/index2.html. Date of access: 23.06.2014.
- ISO 704: 2009. Terminology Work — Principles and Methods. 3rd ed. Technical Committee ISO/TC 37, Terminology and Other Language and Content Resources, Subcommittee SC 1, Principles and Methods. Geneva, ISO, 2009, 74 p.
- GOST R ISO 704—2010. Terminologicheskaya rabota. Printsipy i metody [State Standard GOST R ISO 704—2010. Terminological Work. Principles and Methods]. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2012, 581 p.
- Moyseychik E.A., Avdenya A.V., Vovna E.E., Zavadskiy V.Yu. Belorusskoyazychnaya nauchno-tekhnicheskaya terminologiya v stroitel'stve [Belorussian Language Scientific and Technical Terminology in Construction]. Vestnik BNTU [Proceedings of Belarusian National Technical University]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 94—101.
- Goritskiy V.M. Diagnostika metallov [Diagnostics of Metals]. Moscow, Metallurgizdat Publ., 2004, 408 p.
- Stroitel'naya mekhanika: sbornik rekomenduemykh terminov [Construction Mechanics: Collection of Recommended Terms]. Issue 82. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1969, 48 p.
- Volkova I.N., Danilenko L.P. Standartizatsiya terminologii v SSSR i mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiyakh [Terminology Stardantization in the USSR and International Organizations]. Moscow, VNIIKI Publ., 1978, 49 p.
-
Tseva Anna Viktorovna -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
assistant lecturer, Department of Architectural and Structural Design, Mytishchi Branch, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 50 Olimpiyskiy prospekt, Mytishchi, Moscow Region, 141006, Russian Federation;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
-
Giyasov Botir Iminzhonovich -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, chair, Department of Architectural and Construction Design, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; +7 (495) 287-49-14;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
The development of a new regulatory base in the field of ropeways construction in the Russian Federation is currently coming to an end. Federal legislation defines the following priorities: updating of Construction Norms and Regulations and state standard specifications, energy saving and energy efficiency, converging Russian and European Union standards (including standards for building design - Eurocodes). This work should be completed in 2014. Experience in designing and coordinating passenger ropeways projects may lead, after analyzing the current status of regulatory legal base, to the following suggestions: simplifying the order of ropeways registration and commissioning for the reduction in administrative resource; new regulatory base should include the links to appropriate Eurocodes (a list of which is provided in the article). Operating personnel and designers might also find useful clarifications on the application of Eurocodes and the links to the corresponding Russian normative documents, which regulate design, calculation and control of both the ropeway and its separate parts. Absence or under fulfillment of such rules (for example, as in the case of the method of calculating construction during various working/non-working ropeway modes) should lead to their further development, which may be carried out by a combined group of ropeway designers, ropeway technologists and other related specialists; expanding security rules for passenger, cargo and ski lift ropeways on other types of cable transport, such as APM-ATS systems, which may be used throughout the Russian Federation in the future.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.10.7-15
References
- Bovskiy G.N. Fragmenty istorii razvitiya kanatnykh dorog v nashey strane [History Fragments of the Development of Ropeways in our Country]. Bezopasnost' truda v promyshlennosti [Safety of Work in the Industry]. 2013, no. 4, pp. 86—88. (in Russian)
- Spravka po sblizheniyu (garmonizatsii) polozheniy osnovopolagayushchikh normativnykh dokumentov Rossiyskoy Federatsii s zarubezhnymi standartami, v tom chisle evropeyskimi [The Reference on Rapprochement (Harmonization) of the Provisions of Fundamental Normative Documents of the Russian Federation with Foreign Standards, Including European]. Tekhekspert: portal dlya proektirovshchikov [Technical Expert: Web Portal for Designers]. Available at: http://www.project-help.ru/assets/files/spravka.doc. Date of access: 15.11.2013. (in Russian)
- Basin E. Evrokody v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: printsip «Ne navredi!» [Eurocodes in the Russian Federation: the principle "Don't do harm!"]. Stroitel'stvo.ru : internet-zhurnal [Stroitel'stvo.ru: Internet Journal]. 2012, no. 12. Available at: http://www.rcmm.ru. Date of access: 15.11.2013. (in Russian)
- Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 2000/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 relating to cableway installations designed to carry persons (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation). Official Journal of the European Communities. 03.05.2000, L 106/21.
- Kazakova E. Nikolay Vecher: «Perekhod na evrokody sozdast na rossiyskom rynke bolee konkurentnuyu sredu» [Transition to Eurocodes will create more competitive environment in the Russian market]. Available at: http://www.estateline.ru/interviews/178/. Date of access: 15.11.2013. (in Russian)
- 2000/9/EG "Leitfaden für die Anwendung der Richtlinie 2000/9/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20. März 2000 über Seilbahnen für den Personenverkehr". Luxemburg, 2006, 155 p.
- Directive 2000/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 relating to cableway installations designed to carry persons. Official Journal of the European Communities. 3.5.2000, L 106, pp. 21—48.
- Sotov I.N., Averin S.Yu. Poryadok polucheniya razreshitel'nykh dokumentov [Order of Obtaining Allowing Documents]. Gornolyzhnaya industriya Rossii [Ski Industry of Russia]. 2010, no. 3 (15), pp. 64—67. (in Russian)
- Bovskiy G. Aktual'nye voprosy ekspertizy [Topical Issues of Expert Examination]. Gornolyzhnaya industriya Rossii [Ski Industry of Russia]. 2010, no. 1 (13), pp. 40—42. (in Russian)
- Averin S.Yu. Zakonodatel'naya baza i poryadok registratsii kanatnykh dorog [Legislative Base and Procedure for Registration of Ropeways]. Gornolyzhnaya industriya Rossii [Ski Industry of Russia]. 2011, no. 5, pp. 30—33. (in Russian)
- Bovskiy G. Kanatnye dorogi [Ropeways]. Gornolyzhnaya industriya Rossii [Ski Industry of Russia]. 2007, no. 7, pp. 44—45. (in Russian)
- Kontseptsiya sozdaniya turisticheskogo klastera v Severo-Kavkazskom federal'nom okruge, Krasnodarskom krae i Respublike Adygeya [The Concept of Creating a Tourist Cluster in North Caucasus Federal District, Krasnodar Krai and the Republic of Adygea]. Moscow, 2011, 221 p. (in Russian)
- POMA. Lift Indefication Number S14580. Variant Indefication Number 4. Tower Calculation Note. 2010, 91 p.
- Ob utverzhdenii Federal'nykh norm i pravil v oblasti promyshlennoy bezopasnosti «Pravila bezopasnosti passazhirskikh kanatnykh dorog i funikulerov». Prikaz Rostekhnadzora ot 06.02.2014 № 42 [On Approval of Federal Norms and Regulations in the Field of Industrial Safety "Rules for Safe Operation of Passenger Ropeways and Cable Cars]. Konsul'tant plyus [Consultant Plus]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_163442/?frame=11. Date of access: 06.09.2014. (in Russian)
- Ob utverzhdenii Federal'nykh norm i pravil v oblasti promyshlennoy bezopasnosti «Pravila bezopasnosti gruzovykh podvesnykh kanatnykh dorog». Prikaz Federal'noy sluzhby po ekologicheskomu, tekhnologicheskomu i atomnomu nadzoru ot 22 noyabrya 2013 g. № 563 g. Moskva [On Approval of Federal Norms and Regulations in the Field of Industrial Safety "Rules for Safe Operation of Cargo Ropeways. Order of Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision from November, 22 2013 no. 563, Moscow]. Rossiyskaya gazeta [Russian Newspaper]. 2014, March 3. Available at: http://www.rg.ru/2014/03/03/kanat-doroga-site-dok.html. Date of access: 06.03.2014. (in Russian)
- Las Vegas CityCenter APM. Automated Urban Transit. Automated transit sistem. Available at: http://www.leaelliott.com/automated-transit-systems.html#p40. Date of access: 06.03.14.
- People Mover. Venice, Italy. Doppelmayr Cable Car. Available at: http://www.dcc.at/files/sites/default/data/DCC/References/troncheto_piazzale_roma_schuttle_italy_press_release.pdf. Date of access: 06.03.14.
- Mandalay Bay Tram, Las Vegas, NV, USA Doppelmayr Cable Car. Available at: http://www.dcc.at/gallery/mandalay-bay-tram-las-vegas-usa/. Date of access: 06.03.14.
- Cabletren Bolivariano. Caracas, Venezuela. Doppelmayr Cable Car. Available at: http://www.dcc.at/gallery/cabletren-bolivariano-caracas-venezuela. Date of access: 06.03.14.
- Types of Ropeways. Leitner ropeways. Available at: http://en.leitner-ropeways.com/Infocenter/Types-of-Ropeways. Date of access: 06.03.14.