EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REALIZATION UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF RANDOM FACTORS

Vestnik MGSU 11/2017 Volume 12
  • Sborshchikov Sergey Borisovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) octor of Economic Sciences, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Head of Department of Technology, Organization and Management in Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation.
  • Shinkareva Galina Nikolaevna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) postgraduate student, Department of Information Systems, Technologies and Automation in Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation.
  • Maslova Lyubov’ Alexandrovna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) postgraduate student, Department of Construction of Nuclear Industry Objects, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation.
  • Leybman Dmitriy Mikhailovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) postgraduate student, Department of Construction of Nuclear Industry Objects, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation.

Pages 1240-1247

Subject: the article proposes the methods for flexible regulation of administrative and organizational-technical relations between participants of the construction process which are based on integrated management contracts to address the issues related to realization of investment-construction projects in due time and within the funding limit under the influence of random factors. Research objectives: development of a conceptual simulation model of the process of making managerial decisions within the framework of realization of investment-construction project taking into account uncertainty. Materials and methods: We used the principles of the theory of control of technical and manufacturing systems, cybernetics, and also the methods of organizational, logical-semantic and simulation modeling, the works of domestic and foreign scholars on the problem under study. Results: by creating a functional simulation model for realization of investment-construction project, the construction process is considered as an iterative activity that is characterized by a list of indicators describing the state of the project at each control point. Controlled parameters include: planned indicators of the start and end date, and also the cost of execution of works depending on the project realization option (nomenclature of works, material and technical resources, labor intensity, machine capacity). Also, we characterize the basic criteria for efficiency of managerial influence on the realization of construction projects. Conclusions: we substantiated the necessity of taking into account the influence of random factors in the process of realization of investment-construction projects to determine more accurate predictive estimates of cost and duration of construction, especially for objects financed at the expense of state funds and built on the “fixed” contract price.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2017.11.1240-1247

Download

Development of institutional bases of leasing

Vestnik MGSU 2/2016
  • Yas’kova Natal’ya Yur’evna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Department of Economy and Management in the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Alekseeva Tat’yana Romanovna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Economy and Management in the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 146-158

Institutional approach to the research of leasing in modern conditions is considered in the article. Formal and informal institutions of the leasing relations are investigated. Ratios of public and subjective expenses and benefits in institutional system of leasing are shown. Features of interaction of agents of the leasing relations, their interests and tendency to manifestation of opportunistic behavior are investigated. The typology of mechanisms of implementation of institutional changes is considered. The need of structural changes of the institutes of leasing relations is proved. It is offered to introduce “institution of engineering” in the structure of institutions of leasing relations. It will allow providing harmonization of the interests of the agents of leasing relations, decreasing their opportunistic behavior, and reducing the transactional expenses of the participants of leasing. It will promote prevention of their opportunistic behavior and reduction of transaction expenses of the participants of leasing. In our opinion, “the institution of leasing” is a set of formal and informal rules, norms and mechanisms of enforcement of their performance (institutes of property, financial rent (leasing), crediting, insurance and other institutes of leasing relations), which govern the property and economic relations, the arising relations with acquisition of ownership and its subsequent assignment for use for a certain time with payment. These norms and rules are necessary for ensuring stability and definiteness in the relations between the participants of leasing, and also for protection of their rights and economic interests.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.2.146-158

References
  1. Bazhenova V.I. Institutsional’naya model’ lizingovykh otnosheniy [Institutional Model of the leasing relations]. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava [Economic and Law Issues]. 2011, no. 12 (42),pp. 16—23. (In Russian)
  2. Krutchankova K.A., Bukhtiyarova T.I. Institutsional’naya sreda innovatsionnogo razvitiya ekonomiki regiona [Institutional Environment of Innovative Development of Economy of the Region]. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya [Fundamental Research]. 2013, no. 6, pp. 1485—1492. (In Russian)
  3. Sannikova T.D. K voprosu o transformatsii institutsional’noy sredy innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti v regione [To a Question of Transformation of the Institutional Environment of Innovative Activity in the Region]. Innovatsionnyy Vestnik Region [Innovation Proceedings “Region”]. 2013, no. 2, pp. 67—71. (In Russian)
  4. Timofeeva G.V. Institutsional’naya infrastruktura ekonomiki: metodologicheskiy aspekt issledovaniya [Institutional Infrastructure of Economy: Methodological Aspect of Research]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [News of Volgograd State Technical University]. 2005, no. 5, pp. 10—15. (In Russian)
  5. Kamenetskiy M.I., Yas’kova N.Yu. Administrativnyy resurs kak faktor povysheniya effektivnosti sistemy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Administrative Resources as a Factor in Improving the Efficiency of the State Administration System]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Problems of Forecasting]. 2015, no. 2, pp. 33—42. (In Russian)
  6. Buchanan J. Choosing What to Choose. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 1994, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 123—135.
  7. Dahl R.A. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1956.
  8. Dawns A. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, Harper&Row, 1957.
  9. Davis L., North D. Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. Cambridge, 1971, 803 p.
  10. Pejovich S. The Market for Institutions vs. Capitalism by Fiat. Kyklos. 1994, vol. 47, pp. 519—528.
  11. Pejovich S. The Market for Institutions versus the Strong Hand of the State: The Case of Eastern Europe. B. Dallago and L. Mittone (eds.). Economic Institutions, Markets and Competition. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 1996, pp. 111—126.
  12. Ayupov A.A. Primenenie innovatsionnogo lizingovogo optsiona kak instrumenta khedzhirovaniya operatsiy lizinga [Application of An Innovative Leasing Option as Instrument of Hedging of Operations of Leasing]. Vektor nauki Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vektor Nauki of Togliatti State University]. 2012, no. 3 (21), pp. 115—118. (In Russian)
  13. Alekseeva T.R. Lizingovye tekhnologii v innovatsionnom razvitii stroitel’nogo kompleksa [Leasing Technologies in Innovative Development of Construction Complex]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014, no. 5, pp. 152—161. (In Russian)
  14. Alekseeva T.R. Innovatsionnyy lizingovyy inzhiniring v stroitel’nom komplekse [Innovative Leasing Engineering in the Construction Complex]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo [Economy and Enterprenership]. 2015, no. 4—2 (57—2), pp. 583—590. (In Russian)
  15. Batrutdinov A.S., Fedoseev I.V. Lizing kak sposob finansovo-kreditnogo obespecheniya innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti stroitel’nogo predpriyatiya [Leasing as way of Financial and Credit Ensuring of the Innovative Activity of a Construction Enterprise]. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki [Problems of Modern Economy]. 2006, no. 3—4, pp. 237—240. (In Russian)
  16. Ibraeva A.A. Sushchnost’ i funktsii lizinga v sisteme ekonomicheskikh otnosheniy khozyaystvuyushchikh sub”ektov [Essence and Functions of Leasing in the System of Economic Relations of Economic Entities]. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki [Problems of Modern Economy]. 2010, no. 4 (36), pp. 196—199. (In Russian)
  17. Prokaeva I.G. Sravnenie effektivnosti lizinga i kredita [Comparison of the Efficiency of Leasing and Credit]. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki (Novosibirsk) [Problems of Modern Economy (Novosibirsk)]. 2013, no. 11, pp. 8—12. (In Russian)
  18. Syrtsova O.N. Lizing kak instrument modernizatsii ekonomiki Rossii [Leasing as a Tool for Modernization of Russian Economy]. Lizing [Leasing]. 2012, no. 8, pp. 14—29. (In Russian)
  19. Filosofova T.G. Effektivnost’ ispol’zovaniya lizinga v skhemakh modernizatsii [Efficiency of Using Leasing in Modernization Schemes]. Lizing [Leasing]. 2011, no. 9, pp. 6—22. (In Russian)
  20. Yas’kova N.Yu., Kamenetskiy M.I. Krizis otechestvennoy modeli upravleniya stroitel’stvom i rynkom nedvizhimosti [Crisis of the Domestic Management Model of the Construction and Real Estate Market]. Ekonomika stroitel’stva [Economy of the Construction]. 2009, no. 3 (576), pp. 3—12. (In Russian)
  21. Miceli T.J., Sirmans C.F., Turnbull G.K. The Property-Contract Boundary: An Economic Analysis of Leases. American Law and Economics Review. Oxford University Press. 2001, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 165—185. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aler/3.1.165.
  22. Yas’kova N.Yu. Tendentsii razvitiya stroitel’nykh korporatsiy v novykh usloviyakh [Development Trends of Construction Corporations in New Environment]. Nauchnoe obozrenie [Scientific Review]. 2013, no. 5, pp. 174—178. (In Russian)
  23. Yas’kova N.Yu. Evolyutsiya protsessov razvitiya investitsionno-stroitel’noy deyatel’nosti [Evolution of Investment and Construction Development Processes]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Irkutsk State Technical University]. 2012, no. 1 (60), pp. 178—186. (In Russian)
  24. Auzan A.A. Institutsional'naya ekonomika: Novaya institutsional'naya ekonomicheskaya teoriya [Institutional Economics: New Institutional Economic Theory]. 2nd edition. Moscow, Infra-M Publ., 2011, 447 p. (In Russian)
  25. Blokhin A.A., Valitova L.A., Zolotov A.V., Ivanov V.V., Kalyagin G.V., Levin S.N., Lisin V.S., Martanus O.R., Ovsyannikova A.V. Institutsional'nye ogranicheniya ekonomicheskoy dinamiki [Institutional Restrictions of Economical Dynamics]. Moscow, TEIS Publ., 2009, 524 p. (In Russian)
  26. Nort D. Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Changes and Functioning of the Economy]. Moscow, Nachala Publ., 1997, 180 p. (Sovremennaya institutsional'no-evolyutsionnaya teoriya) [Modern Institutional-Evolution Theory] (In Russian)
  27. Tambovtsev V.L. Pravo i ekonomicheskaya teoriya [Law and Economical Theory]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2005, 224 p. (In Russian)
  28. Uil'yamson O. Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaya kontraktatsiya» [Economical Institutions of Capitalism: Companies, Markets, “Relationship Contracts”]. Saint Petersburg, Lenizdat Publ., 1996, 702 p. (In Russian)

Download

Formalized description of assessment procedures of tender offers (of the construction organizer and contracting companies) in case of engineering control scheme

Vestnik MGSU 10/2016
  • Volkov Andrey Anatol’evich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Doctor of Technical Sciences, corresponding member of Russian Academy of Architectural and Construction Sciences, Professor, Department of Information Systems, Technologies and automation in Construction, Rector, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Sborshchikov Sergey Borisovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, acting chair, Department of Technology, Organization and Management in the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Khripko Tat’yana Vladimirovna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Assistant Lecturer, Department of Construction and Theoretical Mechanics, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 105-111

The procedure of evaluating and selecting tender offers is not only an important element of the control system of investment and construction activity but is also an effective tool to increase its efficiency due to optimization of construction works price, reduction of their duration, stimulating innovations in the production, increasing the quality and engineering safety of construction production. At the recent time when new organizational forms and control schemes of investment and construction activity are appearing the system of competitive bidding gains more importance and new functions, because the choice of construction organizer and contracting companies directly influences the results of the construction. The authors consider the task of selecting the bidders’ offers which is a multicriterion task. The offers are evaluated according to the set of parameters reflecting the effectiveness of investment and construction projects. The criteria selection is based on the fact that the proposals of the organizer of construction and the contractors are related to the cost of works and to the deadlines which directly affects the implementation parameters of investment and construction projects.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.10.105-111

Download

Results 1 - 3 of 3