Vestnik MGSU 7/2016
  • Elmanova Elena Leonidovna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Elena Leonidovnapostgraduate student, Department of Engineering Geology and Geoecology, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 8-17

The proportions of buildings, design and building materials in traditional Muslim architecture depended on geoecological factors of different regions of Islamic countries. One of those factors is a high seismicity site. It had the greatest influence on the appearance of monuments in the selected region. The influence of seismicity on the architecture of the buildings is considered in the article on the example of the architectural monuments of the Republic of Uzbekistan - madrasah of Ulugbek of the 15th century in Samarkand, the Kalyan mosque in Bukhara and the Syrian Umayyad mosque (708 buildings) in Damascus. The seismicity of the region is high. In order to determine the seismic resistance of architectural monuments the requirements SP 14.13330.2014 (the Current set of rules “Construction in seismic regions” (Seismic Building Design Code), revised edition of SNiP II-7-81*) and the Eurocode EN 1998-1 were used. On the basis of calculations tables comparing performance were made. The structural characteristics of monuments were compared with the characteristics required by the standards. The point value of seismicity of the territory which ensured the stability of the buildings was determined. Comparing the proportions of the monuments with Russian and European regulations on earthquake-resistant construction, we demonstrated the compliance of their architectural forms with the seismic activity of the area. Traditional architecture evolved from random search under the influence of the centuries of experience protecting the buildings from adverse natural influences. The design and shape of these ancient Muslim buildings, limited by the requirements of seismic resistance, has been subsequently reiterated in other structures, determining the style of Muslim architecture. The analysis allows us to see how the architects used the general principles of earthquake-resistant construction on different buildings. The destructions during earthquakes occurred only after structural deterioration of the materials, and were local in nature. Most of the buildings have symmetrical structure, the corresponding proportions in plan and in height, with using materials of sufficient “strength and elasticity”. The whole appearance of the buildings and the architectural style is not accidental. The proportions of the buildings - the height, width of span load-bearing structures, walls and openings, the symmetry of the buildings, domes, arches, windows, all structural dimensions were dictated by the requirements of seismic resistance.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.7.8-17

  1. Potapov A.D., Revelis I.L., Chernyshev S.N. Slovar’ po inzhenernoy geologii [Dictionary for Engineering Geology]. Moscow, Infra-M Publ., 2015. (In Russian)
  2. Medvedev S.V., Shebalin N.V. S zemletryaseniem mozhno sporit’ [It is Possible to Argue with an Earthquake]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967, 131 p. (Nauchno-populyarnaya seriya [Popular Science Series]) (In Russian)
  3. Hussam Eldein Zaineh, Hiroaki Yamanaka, Yadab Prasad Dhakal, Rawaa Dakkak, Mohamad Daoud. Simulation of Near Fault Ground Motion of the Earthquake of November 1759 with magnitude of 7.4 along Serghaya Fault, Damascus City, Syria. 15 WCEE LISBOA — 2012. Available at:
  4. Chernyshev S.N. Treshchiny gornykh porod [Rock Cracks]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983, 240 p. (In Russian)
  5. Chernyshev S.N. Printsipy klassifikatsii gruntovykh massivov dlya stroitel’stva [Principles of Classification of Soil Masses for Construction Purposes]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2013, no. 9, pp. 41—46. (In Russian)
  6. Chernyshev S.N. Podkhod k klassifikatsii dispersnykh i skadi gruntovykh massivov dlya stroitel’stva [Approach to the Classification of Disperse Soil Masses for Construction]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2013, no. 10, pp. 94—101. (In Russian)
  7. Chernyshev S.N., Man’ko A.V., Mikhaylov V.V. Obosnovanie vklyucheniya v GOST 25100-2011 klassifikatsii massivov skal’nykh gruntov [Rationale for Inclusion of the Classification of Hard Rock Soils into Russian State Standard GOST 25100-2011]. Inzhenernye izyskaniya [Engineering Surveys]. 2013, no. 14, pp. 22—25. (In Russian)
  8. Potapov A.D., Leybman M.E., Lavrusevich A.A., Chernyshev S.N., Markova I.M., Bakalov A.Yu., Krasheninnikov V.S. Monitoring ob”ektov inzhenernoy zashchity na imeretinskoy nizmennosti [Monitoring of the Objects of Engineering Protection in Imereti Lowland]. Geoekologiya, inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya [Geoecology, Engineering Geology, Hydrogeology, Geocryology]. 2012, no. 5, pp. 406—413. (In Russian)
  9. Khaled Kh.A. Obespechenie seysmostoykosti arkhitekturnykh pamyatnikov arabskogo zodchestva na territorii Sirii : dissertatsiya … kandidata tekhnicheskikh nauk [Earthquake Protection of Architectural Monuments of Arab Architecture in Syria : Dissertation of the Candidate of Technical Sciences]. Saint Petersburg, 2003, 159 p. (In Russian)
  10. Nikonov A.A. «Uzhasnoe potryasenie» Evropy. Lissabonskoe zemletryasenie 1 noyabrya 1755 g. [“The Terrible Shock” of Europe. The Lisbon Earthquake on 1 November 1755]. Priroda [Nature]. 2005, no. 11, pp. 21—29. (In Russian)
  11. Hojatollah R. Kupol kak arkhitektonicheskaya forma mecheti Irana [Dome as a Traditional Architectonic Form of the Mosque of Iran]. Arkhitekton: izvestiya vuzov [Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education]. 2008, no. 23, article 3. Available at: (In Russian)
  12. Ashkan M., Ahmad Y. Persian Domes: History, Morphology and Typologies. Archnet-IJAR. International Journal of Architectural Research. November 2009, vol. 3, issue 3, pp. 98—115.
  13. Ashkan M., Ahmad Y., Arbi E. Pointed Dome Architecture in the Middle East and Central Asia: Evolution, Definitions of Morphology, and Typologies. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. 2012, vol. 6, issue 1, pp. 46—61. DOI:
  14. Ashkan M., Ahmad Y. Discontinuous Double-Shell Domes Through Islamic Eras in the Middle East and Central Asia: History, Morphology, Typologies, Geometry, and Construction. Nexus Network Journal. 2010, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 287—319. DOI:
  15. Rababeh S., Al Qablan H., El-Mashaleh M. Utilization of Tie-Beams for Strengthening Stone Masonry Arches in Nabataean Construction. Journal of Architectural Conservation. 2013, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 118—130. DOI:
  16. Rababeh S., Al Qablan H., Abu-Khafajah S., El-Mashaleh M. Structural Utilization of Wooden Beams as Anti-Seismic and Stabilising Techniques in Stone Masonry in Qasr El-Bint, Petra, Jordan. Construction and Building Materials. 2014, vol. 54, pp. 60—69. DOI:
  17. Borisenko A.Yu., Khudyakov Yu.S. Opyt sistematizatsii dannykh o zemletryaseni-yakh, proiskhodivshikh na territorii stran dal’nego, srednego i blizhnego vostoka v drevnosti i srednevekov’e, i ob ikh posledstviyakh dlya naseleniya i sredy obitaniya [Experience of Data Systematization on Earthquakes Having Occurred on the Territory of the Countries of the Far, Middle and Near East in Ancient and Medieval Times and on Their Consequences for Population and Environment]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya [Proceedings of Novosibirsk State University Series: “History and Philology”]. 2012, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 239—261. Available at: (In Russian)
  18. Lawler Andrew. Earthquake Allows Rare Glimpse Into Bam’s Past and Future. Science. 2004, vol. 303, issue 5663, p. 1463. DOI:
  19. Mel’nik V.V. Osobennosti arkhitektury drevnego Damaska [Peculiarities of the Architecture of Ancient Damascus]. Arkhitekton: izvestiya vuzov [Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education]. 2007, no. 17, art. 9. Available at: (In Russian)
  20. Hojatollah R. Ayvan kak traditsionnaya forma v arkhitekture Peredney Azii [Iwan as a Traditional Form of Architecture in Southwest Asia]. Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo [Academia. Architecture and construction. 2008, no. 1, pp. 74—81. (In Russian)
  21. Chernyshev S.N., Elmanova E.L. Faktor otsutstviya drevesiny v formirovanii stilya musul’manskoy arkhitektury [The Fact of the Lack of Wood in the Formation of Muslim Architecture Style]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2015, no. 2, pp. 7—20. (In Russian)
  22. Potapov A.D., Revelis I.L. Zemletryaseniya. Prichiny i posledstviya [Earthquakes. Causes and Consequences]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 2009, 246 p. (In Russian)


Results 1 - 1 of 1