INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

Development of the methodology of the design decision searching in the process of structural metalwork design

Vestnik MGSU 9/2014
  • Volkov Andrey Anatol'evich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Chair, Department of Information Systems, Technologies and Automation in Civil Engineering, Rector, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Vasil'kin Andrey Aleksandrovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Steel Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337; + 7 (499) 183-37-65; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 123-137

The design decision is usually a synthesis of various requirements to the construction object. The main difficulty is to approve the solution results of all the subtasks, because these various requirements often contradict each other. In the article the existing approaches to design solutions searching for steel structural designs are considered, features of standard and individual design are specified. The associative method of choosing the design decision is offered. The process of search is directed in order to receive favorable coincidence of design situations, current and implemented earlier and to apply the approved decisions. In order to consider the greatest possible quantity of combinations of design solution for structural designs in the article it is offered to create a tree of enumeration of possibilities for decisions, in case of which the possible values of decision parameters vary. The algorithm of searching the design decision is shown by a method of a tree of search creation. Three levels of solution for a problem of steel structural designs are thus described. Also the question is raised of the effectiveness of padding expenses for creating the complete tree of search of options, their analysis and assessment.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.9.123-137

References
  1. Naginskaya V.S. Avtomatizatsiya arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo proektirovaniya [Automation of Architectural and Construction Design]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1979, 175 p.
  2. Ignatov V.P., Ignatova E.V. Evristiki dannykh v stroitel'nom proektirovanii [Data Heuristics in Construction Design]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2009, no. 2, pp. 226—229.
  3. Kilina A.A., Parinov M.V., Chizhov M.I. Arkhitektura sistemy podderzhki prinyatiya i kontrolya proektnykh resheniy [Architecture of Support System for Design Decision Making and Control]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Proceedings of Voronezh State Technical University]. 2011, vol. 7, no. 12-2, pp. 41—44.
  4. Agafonkina N.V., Karpov Yu.A., Stegantsev D.N. Model' odnokriterial'nogo prinyatiya resheniy v usloviyakh neopredelennosti [Model of One-Criteria Decision Making in the Conditions of Uncertainty]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Proceedings of Voronezh State Technical University]. 2009, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 36—37.
  5. Veera P. Darji, Ravipudi V. Rao. Application of AHP/EVAMIX Method for Decision Making in the Industrial Environment. American Journal of Operations Research. 2013, no. 3, pp. 542—569. Available at: http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=39747#.VA18gPnV9cQ. Date of access: 03.06.2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2013.36053.
  6. Dixon J.R. Design Engineering: Inventiveness, Analysis, and Decision Making. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1966, 354 p.
  7. Hill P. Nauka i iskusstvo proektirovaniya. Metody proektirovaniya, nauchnoe obosnovanie resheniy [Design Science and Art. Design Methods, Scientific Rationale of Solutions]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1973, 262 p.
  8. Botvinnik M.M. O reshenii netochnykh perebornykh zadach [On Solving Unprecise Brute Tasks]. Moscow, Sovetskoe radio Publ., 1979, 152 p.
  9. Novikova A.N. Opyt optimizatsii proektnogo protsessa na primere real'nogo ob"ekta v g. Kazani [Experience of Optimizing Design Process on the Example of Real Object in Kazan]. Izvestiya KGASU [Proceedings of Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering]. 2011, no. 4 (18), pp. 100—106.
  10. Khanina A.B., Alekhin V.N. Vnedrenie ekspertnykh sistem v protsesse proektirovaniya stroitel'nykh konstruktsiy [Expert Systems Implementation in the Process of Building Structures Design]. Akademicheskiy vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN [Academic Proceedings of UralNIIproject of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences]. 2011, no. 2, pp. 82—85.
  11. Koch C., Buhl H. "Integrated Design Process" a Concept for Green Energy Engineering. Engineering. 2013, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 292—298. Available at: http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=28771#.VA2GHvnV9cQ. Date of access: 03.06.2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/eng.2013.53039.
  12. Ginzburg A.V., Vasil'kin A.A. Postanovka zadachi optimal'nogo proektirovaniya stal'nykh konstruktsiy [Problem Statement for Optimal Design of Steel Structures]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014, no. 6, pp. 52—62.
  13. Zhavnerov P.B., Ginzburg A.V. Povyshenie organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskoy nadezhnosti stroitel'stva za schet strukturnykh meropriyatiy [Using Structural Actions to Improve Organizational and Technological Reliability of Construction Activities]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2013, no. 3, pp. 196—200.

Download

Results 1 - 1 of 1