Vestnik MGSU 9/2017 Volume 12
  • Grebenshchikov Vladimir Sergeevich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Candidate of Economic Sciences, Vice-Rector, Associate Professor of the Department of Construction Organization and Real Estate Management, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation.

Pages 1053-1060

Subject: the article considers the problems of managerial and organizational-economic relations reflecting the conceptual modeling of the interrelationships of the main participants in development activities in the implementation of investment and construction projects of industrial parks, and describes organizational forms and methods of managing the total cost of ownership of industrial real estate, based on a functional approach and functional modeling of the industrial development structure. Research objectives: elaboration of conceptual models of the functional structure of industrial development of industrial parks using methodological approaches based on the principles of functional-system modeling of development structures. Materials and methods: a set of systemic interrelated methodological approaches based on the use of functional modeling theory, economic-mathematical, technical-economic, logical analysis, as well as reliability and risk theories, simulation and functional statistical modeling, expert assessments, situational analysis and forecasting was used. Results: the article demonstrates the results of theoretical research of the author in the field of methodological modeling of industrial development systems for the construction of industrial parks based on the use of a functional-system approach. The final theoretical functional model is presented, when the object of research is considered in the form of functions or goal settings of the action, which is based on selection and structuring of subsystems consisting of function-stages, function-tasks, objects of reproduction, as well as different levels and situations of management, and also options for state-private partnership. The concept of «industrial development of industrial parks» was also refined. Conclusions: the performed research value was determined from the standpoint of elaboration of the theory and methodology in the field of industrial development with a focus on construction of large, complex and unique objects, as well as on scientific and practical evolution of the processes of state-private partnership in the management of industrial construction of industrial parks.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2017.9.1053-1060


Design of ropeways of the mountain recreational centers

Vestnik MGSU 11/2014
  • Tseva Anna Victorovna - Mytishchinskiy Branch, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Assistant Lecturer, Department of Architectural and Construction Design, Mytishchinskiy Branch, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 50 Olimpiyskiy prospekt, Mytishchi, Moscow Region, 141006, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 171-179

Ropeways are an eco-friendly and economically viable transport used for transportation of passengers and shipment. Ropeways are widely applied during construction in the conditions of a mountainous relief. The state programs aimed at the development of mountain recreational centers (MRCs) stipulate ropeways construction in accordance with the MRC situational plan. Safety and comfort of a ropeway are defined not only by its technical characteristics, but also by its linking to the relief, MRC facilities and infrastructure. The article describes the main design stages of a ropeway starting from the concept, a choice of its axis, determination of capacity, type of a ropeway, requirements to the track before the design of drop-off/pick-up zones. For each design stage the explanations, which reflect real work specifics, are provided, together with the technical characteristics for calculations and solution samples. The concept defines the functional purpose of a ropeway: ski slopes/ tourist zones/ recreation areas; the season of ropeway operation, the scheme of communications with the MRC objects, the capacity of reception base, the minimum distance from the bottom stations to residential complexes. The critical decisions of axis and track design are carried out by a coalition of designer-planners, expert designers and ropeway technologists. The ropeway, which performs transport function, unites all the objects of the mountain recreational center into a single complex. The optimum placement of a ropeway deals with the questions of comfort, safety and profitability, therefore greatly contributing to the quality of the whole ropeway project. During the MRC development one should consider the questions of infrastructure expansion, year-round ropeway operation and increasing ski tracks capacity, which will demand ropeway modernization and/ or changes in the situational plan of the mountain recreational center.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.11.171-179

  1. Le t?l?ph?rique urbain, un mode de transport qui monte. Qu’en savons-Nous? Agence d’Urbanisme de Caen-M?tropole. 2013, no. 56, p. 4.
  2. Transports par c?bles a?riens en milieu urbain et p?riurbain : quel domaine de pertinence en France? 15 p. (CERTU — STRMTG — CETE ; D?cembre 2011). Available at: Date of access: 12.07.2014.
  3. Bovskiy G. Kanatnye dorogi [Ropeways]. Gornolyzhnaya industriya Rossii [Skiing Industry in Russia]. 2007, no. 7, pp. 44—45. (In Russian)
  4. Obustroystvo gornykh kurortov [Arrangement of Mountain Resorts]. Gorimpeks Publ., Moscow, 2008, 96 p. (In Russian)
  5. Stations skis aux pieds. Available at: Date of access: 12.07.2014.
  6. PB 10-559—03. Pravila ustroystva i bezopasnoy ekspluatatsii passazhirskikh podvesnykh i buksirovochnykh kanatnykh dorog [PB 10-559-03. Rules for Arrangement and Safe Operation of Passenger Out-Board and Towingropeways]. Rossiyskaya gazeta [Russian Newspaper]. 2003, June 21, no. 120/1. (In Russian)
  7. Kontseptsiya sozdaniya turisticheskogo klastera v Severo-Kavkazskom federal’nom okruge, Krasnodarskom krae i Respublike Adygeya [The Concept of Creation of a Tourist Cluster in North Caucasus Federal District, Krasnodar Krai and the Republic of Adygea]. Moscow, 2011, 221 p. (In Russian)
  8. RM2. Conception g?n?rale des t?l?ph?riques : Les Guide Technique. Version du 29 janvier 2008. 135 p. Available at: Date of access: 12.07.2014.
  9. Tekhnologii gornolyzhnoy industrii [Technologies of the Aalpine Skiing Industry]. Rosinzhiniring Publ. Available at: Date of access: 12.07.2014. (In Russian)
  10. Inzhenernye resheniya po zashchite territorii [Engineering Decisions on Protection of the Territory]. Rosinzhiniring Publ. Available at: Date of access: 12.07.2014. (In Russian)
  11. Tekhnologicheskiy proekt. PPKD TSD 13 c shestimestnymi kreslami na ottseplyaemykh zazhimakh. STK «Gornaya karusel’» pos. Krasnaya Polyana g. Sochi. Poyasnitel’naya zapiska ¹ 14401PZ [Technological project. PPKD TSD13 with Six-seater Chairs on the Unhooked Clips. Sports and Tourist Complex "Gornaya karusel’" in the village Krasnaya Polyana, Sochi. Explanatory Note no. 14401PZ].Gortekhproektpostavka Publ., Moscow, 2013, 33 p. (In Russian)
  12. Etude de faisabilit? d'une liaison t?l?ph?rique entre Gallieni et La Noue. Egis Rail. Available at: Date of access: 12.07.2014.
  13. Alshalalfah B., Shalaby A., Dale S. Experiences with Aerial Ropeway Transportation Systems in the Urban Environment. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. March 2014, vol. 140, no. 1, 04013001. DOI:
  14. Alshalalfah B., Shalaby A., Dale S., Othman F. Improvements and Innovations in Aerial Ropeway Transportation Technologies: Observations from Recent Implementations. Journal of Transportation Engineering. August 2013, vol. 139, no. 8, pp. 814—821. DOI:
  15. Alshalalfah B., Shalaby A., Othman F. Aerial Ropeway Transit — Exploring its Potential for Makkah. Center of Research Excellence in Hajj and Omrah. 279 p. Available at:; Date of access: 12.07.2014.



Vestnik MGSU 2/2013
  • Dutsev Mikhail Viktorovich - Nizhniy Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (NNGASU) Candidate of Architecture, Аssociate Professor, Department of Architectural Design; +7 (831) 430-17-83., Nizhniy Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (NNGASU), 65 Ilyinskaya St., Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 22-28

The author describes the concept of integration of art in the contemporary architecture. The relevance of this topic is determined by the need to develop a scientific approach to the problem of integrity of modern architecture on the level of art. The author analyzes modern architecture as the art that connects specified and spontaneous conditions into a uniform artistic ensemble, or a work of architectural art. Their interaction results in new forms of architectural and artistic expressiveness and “kinds” of architectural art of a special synthetic quality. By describing the concept of artistic integrity of space, the author proves that the relevant urban understanding is related to the periodic transformation of the “space-time” concept. The architecture embodies the “form” of time, while the integrity of the historic environment is determined by development of the concept of its identity.Integration of art into architectural activity is represented by a system of integration “fields” in the space-time context, in the art system in terms of an individual creative activity of an architect. Conceptions of synthesis of architecture and art demonstrated by masters of contemporary architecture determine the unique nature of personal approaches and methodology of the author’s creative activities from the standpoint of unity of an individual language of an architect, multidimensional context and work concept. Integration of art is presented as a procedure of inter-systemic and inter-discipline interactions aimed at the achievement of a new level of creative development and described by a theoretical model.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2013.2.22-28

  1. Ikonnikov A.V. Prostranstvo i forma v arkhitekture i gradostroitel’stve [Space and Form in Architecture and Urban Construction]. Moscow, Kom-Kniga Publ., 2006, 352 p.
  2. Azizyan I.A., author and editor. Glava 19. Otechestvennaya teoriya arkhitektury v kruge gumanitarnogo znaniya [Chapter 19. Domestic Theory of Architecture in the Framework of Humanitarian Knowledge]. Ocherki istorii teorii arkhitektury Novogo i Noveyshego vremeni [Essays of the History of the Theory of Architecture of the New and the Newest Time]. Ros. akad. arkhitektury i stroit. nauk [Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences]. NII teorii arkhitektury i gradostroitelstva [Scientific and Research Institute of Theory of Architecture and Urban Construction]. St.Petersburg, Kolo Publ., 2009, pp. 608—618.
  3. Ryabushin A.V. Arkhitektory rubezha tysyacheletiy [Architects at the Turn of the Millenium]. Moscow, Iskusstvo XXI vekà publ., 2005, 288 p.
  4. Gel’fond A.L., Dutsev M.V. Arkhitekturno-khudozhestvennyy sintez kak sredstvo dialoga [Synthesis of Architecture and Art as the Instrument of a Dialogue]. Privolzhskiy nauchnyy zhurnal [Scientific Journal of the Volga Region]. Nizhniy Novgorod, NNGASU Publ., 2010, no. 4, pp. 147—152.
  5. Dutsev M.V. Kontseptsiya arkhitektury sovremennogo tsentra iskusstv [Concept of Architecture of a Contemporary Centre of Arts]. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co., 2012, 192 p.
  6. Azizyan I.A., Dobritsyna I.A., Lebedeva G.S. Teoriya kompozitsii kak poetika arkhitektury [Theory of Composition as the Poetics of Architecture]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2002, 568 p.
  7. Rappaport A.G. Prostranstvo i substantsiya. Ch. 1. Ot funktsii k prostranstvu [Space and Substance. Ch. 1. From Function to Space]. Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo. [Academy. Architecture and Construction]. 2012, no. 2, pp. 20—23.
  8. Rappaport A.G. Prostranstvo i substantsiya. Ch. 2. Arkhitektura kak substantsiya [Space and Substance. Ch. 2. Architecture as Substance]. Academia. Arkhitektura I stroitel’stvo [Academy. Architecture and Construction]. 2012, no. 3, pp. 7—11.
  9. Dobritsyna I.A. Ot postmodernizma — k nelineynoy arkhitekture: Arkhitektura v kontekste sovremennoy filosofii i nauki [From Post-modernism to Non-linear Architecture: Architecture in the Context of Contemporary Philosophy and Science]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2004, pp. 248—250.
  10. Kholodova L.P. Fundamental’naya arkhitekturnaya nauka: segodnya i zavtra [Fundamental Architectural Science: Today and Tomorrow]. Arkhitekton: izvestiya vuzov. [Architecton: News of Institutions of Higher Education]. December 2012, no. 40. Available at:
  11. Azizyan I.A., editor. Voprosy teorii arkhitektury: Arkhitektura i kul’tura Rossii v XX veke [Issues of the Theory of Architecture: Architecture and Culture of Russia in the 20th Century]. Moscow, LIBROKOM Publ., 2009, 472 p.


Results 1 - 3 of 3