ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. RESTRUCTURING AND RESTORATION

RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURE OF YEREVAN IN THE 20TH CENTURY. IDENTIFICATION OF THE MAIN STAGES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANNING STRUCTURE OF A DWELLING UNIT

Vestnik MGSU 5/2016
  • Azatyan Karen Rubenovich - National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia (NUACA) Candidate of Architecture, Associate Professor, Department of Architectural Drafting and Architectural Environment Design, National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia (NUACA), 105 Teryan str., Yerevan, 0009, Armenia; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 18-27

The article discusses some features of planning solutions of apartments in the architecture of Yerevan, which are typical to different periods, since the turn of 19-20th centuries to the present day. Housing is the chief determinant of human activity. In the process of societal development the house is the foundation of a family, and the family, on its turn, is the key to the stable state. Nevertheless, the time influences the residential architecture. Societal progress periodically affects the living environment. Therefore, housing formation process never reaches the stage of completion: it is always in an endless process of development. The above mentioned primarily concerns the evolution of the planning structure of the apartment. In this context, the dynamics of evolution of housing in Yerevan has accelerated in the second half of the 19th century. The centuries-generated space-planning system of apartment begins to develop in accordance with the rapid changes of social, urban planning and life processes of the time (extension of industry, formation of new socio-economic relations, rapid growth of population, acceleration of construction processes). The impetuous transformation of the dwelling structure is reflected in the complex process of evolution - starting from the traditional houses and ending with the apartments in high-rise buildings. The research of the problems of the traditional dwelling structure, its transformation in the first apartment buildings and diverse improvements of apartment planning solutions contributes to the definition of the main development stages of the dwelling units during the last century, which are observed in the article. Identification of the characteristics of each stage and the multilateral evaluation of different qualities of spatial-planning arrangement of apartments allow working out proper solutions for dwelling units in the future.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.5.18-27

References
  1. Sborshchikov S.B., Sborshchikova M.N. Razvitie metodov upravleniya programmami zhilishchnogo stroitel’stva na osnove prognozirovaniya [Development of the Control Methods of Housing Construction Programs Based on Prediction]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2011, no. 1—1, pp. 221—226. (In Russian)
  2. Subbotin O.S. Kharakternye tipy maloetazhnykh zhilykh zdaniy i istoricheskoe (etnokul’turnoe) rayonirovanie territorii severnogo Kavkaza [Specific Types of Low-Rise Residential Buildings and the Historical (Ethno-Cultural) Zoning of the North Caucasus Territory]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2009, no. 3, pp. 22—24. (In Russian)
  3. Azatyan K.R. Nachal’naya stadiya formirovaniya mnogokvartirnykh zhilykh domov v Erevane. Arkhitektura zhilykh sooruzheniy nachala XX veka [The Initial Stage of the Formation of Apartment Blocks in Yerevan. The Architecture of Residential Buildings in the Beginning of the 20th Century]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov EGUAS [Proceedings of Yerevan State University of Architecture and Construction]. Erevan, 2010, vol. II (38), pp. 29—34. (In Russian)
  4. Gasparyan M.A. Arkhitektura Erevana XIX — nachala XX veka [Architecture of Yerevan in the 19th — early 20th century]. Erevan, Ushardzan Publ., 2008, 262 p. (In Russian)
  5. Shagov N.V., Verevkina I.D., Koksharova E.A. Razvitie tipovogo zhilishchnogo stroitel’stva v sovetskoy Rossii s 1917 po 1940 g. [Development of Standard Housing in Soviet Russia from 1917 till 1940]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2013, no. 4, pp. 22—31. (In Russian)
  6. Azatyan K.R. Planirovochnye i funktsional’nye resheniya kvartir v period formirovaniya arkhitektury mnogokvartirnykh domov Erevana [Planning and Functional Solutions of Apartments in Yerevan during the Formation of the Apartment-Block Architecture]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov EGUAS [Proceedings of Yerevan State University of Architecture and Construction]. Erevan, 2013, vol. I (48), pp. 3—18. (In Russian)
  7. Dolukhanyan L.K. Arkhitektura Sovetskoy Armenii: 20-e gody [Architecture of the Soviet Armenia: 1920s]. Erevan, Sovetakan grokh Publ., 1980, 85 p. (In Russian)
  8. Gatsunaev K.N. Dom Narkomfina kak ob”ekt kul’turnogo naslediya [Narkomfin House as a Monument of Cultural Heritage]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014, no. 7, pp. 7—17.
  9. Dudka E.N. Nerealizovannye konkursy 1920—1930-kh gg. v kontekste razvitiya arkhitekturnogo protsessa [Unrealized Competitions of the 1920—1930ies in the Context of the Architecture Development Process]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2012, no. 6, pp. 11—16. (In Russian)
  10. Zurabyan Z.A. Osobennosti arkhitektury zhilogo doma na nachal’nom etape raz-vitiya mnogokvartirnogo gorodskogo zhilishcha Erevana [Characteristics of a Dwelling House Architecture During the Development of the Apartment Urban Housing in Yerevan]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov EGUAS [Proceedings of Yerevan State University of Architecture and Construction]. Erevan, 2010, vol. III (39), pp. 21—24. (In Russian)
  11. Zhdanova I.V. Metody povysheniya kachestva seriynoy zhiloy zastroyki 70—80-kh gg. XX v. [Methods of Improving the Quality of Serial Apartment Block of the 70—80s of the 20th Century]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of the Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2012, no. 1, pp. 22—26. (In Russian)
  12. Hakobyan T.D. Puti modernizatsii krupnopanel’nykh zhilykh zdaniy g. Erevana [Ways of Modernization of Large-Panel Residential Buildings in Yerevan]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014, no. 12, pp. 9—19. (In Russian)
  13. Rashidyan G.G. Razvitie arkhitektury massovogo zhilishcha Armenii i zadachi so-vremennogo etapa [Development of the Architecture of Mass Housing in Armenia and the Problems of the Present Stage]. Erevan, 1999, 88 p. (In Russian)
  14. Rashidyan G.G., Azatyan K.R. Osobennosti arkhitektury novykh zhilykh rayonov massovoy zastroyki Erevana [The Features of Architecture of the Mass Housing in New Residential Areas in Yerevan]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov EGUAS [Proceedings of Yerevan State University of Architecture and Construction]. Erevan, 2013, vol. IV (51), pp. 47—57. (In Russian)
  15. Azatyan K.R., Engoyan A.R., Khanoyan K.R. Usovershenstvovanie metoda tipovogo proektirovaniya zhilykh zdaniy v Erevane i vnedrenie blok-sektsionnoy sistemy v 1970-kh godakh [Improvement of the Standardized Design Methodology of Residential Buildings and Introduction of Bay System in Yerevan in 1970s]. Nauchnye trudy NUASA [Scientific Papers of National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia]. Erevan, 2014, vol. III (54), pp. 3—12. (In Russian)
  16. Rashidyan G.G., Azatyan K.R., Engoyan A.R. Novye podkhody v arkhitekture zhil’ya Erevana v 1970-ykh godakh [New Approaches to the Residential Architecture in Yerevan in the 1970s]. Vestnik inzhenernoy akademii Armenii [Proceedings of Engineering Academy of Armenia]. 2013, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 699—703. (In Russian)
  17. Schroeder U. Variabel nutzbare Hauser und Wohnungen. Bauverlag GmbH. Weisbaden und Berlin, 1980.
  18. Pinchak L.A. Zhilishchnyy fond Ukrainy: sostav, struktura, statistika [Housing Stock of the Ukraine: Composition, Structure, Statistics]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2013, no. 9, pp. 118—124. (In Russian)

Download

CREATION OF A COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT IN PREMISES OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITH ACCOUNT FOR ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS

Vestnik MGSU 8/2012
  • Saltykov Ivan Petrovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) postgraduate student, Department of Architecture of Civil and Industrial Buildings, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 189 - 196

The author provides his multiple-factor approach to the assessment and creation of a comfortable
indoor environment with account for architectural, engineering and ecological parameters.
Architectural parameters include indoor space arrangement, color solutions, etc. The engineering
approach contemplates favorable acoustic, thermal, humidity and lighting conditions. Nowadays,
the problem of the indoor microclimate is resolvable through the assessment of its conditions and
further assurance of comfort with the help of multiple advanced engineering solutions. Civil engineering
solutions may also bring an adequate level of comfort through the application of effi cient
building materials. The ecological safety of any premises has an impact not only on the sense of
comfort, but on the physical stamina and health of residents. The comfort of the inhabited environment
also means appropriate electro-magnetic properties and adequate aeration.
Research projects and advanced solutions are to make their contribution into development of
new criteria of assessment of comfort, particularly, in the inadequate ecological and social urban
environment.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2012.8.189 - 196

References
  1. Zokoley S.V. Arkhitekturnoe proektirovanie, ekspluatatsiya ob”ektov, ikh svyaz’ s okruzhayushchey sredoy [Environmental Science Handbook for Architects and Builders]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1984, 670 p.
  2. MGSN 3.01—01. Zhilye zdaniya. [Moscow City Building Requirements 3.01-01. Residential Buildings.] Moscow, 2001.
  3. Glazychev V.L. Technology of Environment Design. Master-class. Personal web-site of V.L. Glazychev. Available at: www.glazychev.ru. Date of access: 21.03.12.
  4. Nikerov V.A. Ekologichnyy dom glazami fi zika: sovety fi zika [Ecological House as Viewed by the Physicist: the Physicist’s Advice]. Moscow, Energoatomizdat Publ., 1992.
  5. Gagarin V.G., Zemtsov V.A., Igumnov N.M. Ravnoeffektivnost’ okonnykh blokov po parametram teplozashchity i svetopropuskaniya [Equal Effi ciency of Window Blocks in Terms of Thermal Resistance and Light Conductivity]. Krovel’nye i izolyatsionnye materialy [Roofi ng and Insulation Materials]. 2011, no. 4, pp. 41—43.
  6. Shadrin A.S., Shekhter F.L. Povyshenie effektivnosti resheniy bokovogo estestvennogo osveshcheniya [Improvement of Effi ciency of Lateral Daylight Solutions]. Svetotehnika [Illumination Engineering]. Moscow, 1990, no. 10, pp.
  7. Stetskiy S.V. K voprosu o sub”ektivnoy otsenke komfortnosti vnutrenney mikroklimaticheskoy sredy [Subjective Assessment of the Comfort of the Indoor Environment]. Stroitel’nye materialy, oborudovanie, tekhnologii XX veka [Construction Materials, Equipment and Technologies of the 20th Century]. 2008, no. 12, pp. 63—65.
  8. Kirilyuk M.A. Otsenka urovnya komfortnosti zhilishchno-kommunal’nogo i sotsial’no-bytovogo obustroystva sel’skogo poseleniya [Assessment of Comfort of Residential Housing, Utilities and Social Infrastructure of a Rural Settlement]. Mehanizatsiya stroitel’stva [Building Mechanization]. 2010, no. 12, pp. 4—6.
  9. Myagkov M.S. Gorod, arkhitektura, chelovek i klimat [City, Architecture, Person, Climate]. Moscow, Arkhitektura-S Publ., 2007, p. 343.
  10. Kholshchevnikov V.V., Lukov A.V. Klimat mestnosti i mikroklimat pomeshcheniy [Outdoor and Indoor Climate]. Moscow, ASV Publ., 2001.

Download

Real estate space-territorial development

Vestnik MGSU 1/2015
  • Sarchenko Vladimir Ivanovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Candidate of Economic Sciences, Doctoral student, Department of Economy and Management in Construction Water Supply, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; +7 (495) 287-49-19; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 103-111

Urbanization is one of the main sustainable tendencies of modern development. The contemporary state of real estate structure is characterized by high level of heterogeneity. In general, the consolidated design document of Moscow urban development, reconstruction and other forms of developing city territories doesn’t take into account the main tendencies of social and economic development, change of scales and structure of city production capacities, priorities of national economy development, or demand particularities, traditional and perspective preferences of citizens of different categories. The article focuses on systematization of basics of real estate space-territorial development strategic analysis. The author analyses the essence of analytical methods, their purpose, levels and analysis projections. The article emphasizes the estimation of economic effectiveness and revelation of urban environment development reserves.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.1.103-111

References
  1. Glazychev V.L. Strategiya razvitiya kak iskusstvo vybora prioritetov [Development Strategy as Art of Choosing Priorities]. Politiya [Polity]. 2012, no. 1 (64), pp. 147—164. (In Russian)
  2. Giffinger R. Territorial Capital — Understanding and Challenges for a Knowledge Based Strategic Approach. Territorium. 2008, no. 8, pp. 7—15.
  3. Yas’kova N.Yu. Instrumentariy obespecheniya kachestva gorodskoy sredy [Tools of Providing the Quality of City Environment]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Irkutsk State Technical University]. 2013, no. 10 (81), pp. 380—382. (In Russian)
  4. Yas’kova N.Yu. Sovremennye formaty strategii razvitiya gorodskoy nedvizhimosti [Modern Forms of City Real Estate Development Strategies]. Nauchnoe obozrenie [Science Review]. 2014, no. 7-1, pp. 392—396. (In Russian)
  5. Gertsberg L.Ya. Kachestvo gorodskoy sredy: problemy proektirovaniya i realizatsii [Quality of City Environment: Problems of Design and Implementation]. Gradostroitel’stvo [Urban Development]. 2013, no. 2 (24), pp. 29—33. (In Russian)
  6. Ahlke B., Perner A., Schön K.P. The Future of European Spatial Development Policy II Research Review. Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development. 2010, no. 21, pp. 2—5.
  7. Riguelle F., Thomas I., Verhetsel A. Measuring Urban Polycentrism: A European Case Study and its Implications. Journal of Economic Geography. 2007, vol. 7, issue 2, pp.193—215. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl025.
  8. Larionov A.N. Problemy formirovaniya teorii i realizatsii praktiki stroitel’stva «zhivogo doma» v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The Problems of Theory Formation and Practice Implementation of the Construction of “Alive House” in the Russian Federation]. Ekonomika i upravlenie narodnym khozyaystvom [Economy and Management of the National Economy]. 2014, no. 1/2 (30/31), pp. 46—59. (In Russian)
  9. Larionov A.N. Metodologicheskiy podkhod k optimizatsii ekologichnogo zhilishchnogo stroitel’stva [Methodological Approach to Ecological Housing Construction Optimization]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN [Proceedings of the Economics Institute Of RAS]. 2009, no. 34, pp. 197—210. (In Russian)
  10. Yas’kova N.Yu., Matveeva M.V. Innovatsionnyy fokus investitsionnoy deyatel’nosti v ramkakh modernizatsii natsional’noy ekonomiki [Innovational Focus of the Investment Activity in Frames of National Economy Modernization]. Ekonomichniy chasopis-XXI [Economical Journal-21]. 2014, vol. 1, no. 1—2, pp. 42—45. (In Russian)
  11. Coiacetto E. Industry Structure in Real Estate Development: Is City Building Competitive? Urban Policy and Research. 2009, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 117—135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08111140802499080.
  12. Potapov A.D., Senyushchenkova I.M., Novikova O.O., Gudkova E.A. Problema ispol’zovaniya gorodskikh narushennykh territoriy [Problem of Use of Disturbed Urban Areas]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2012, no. 9, pp. 197—202. (In Russian)
  13. Sadovnikova N.P., Sanzhapov B.Kh., Gnedkova E.P. Razrabotka kontseptsii sistemy podderzhki prinyatiya resheniy po obespecheniyu ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti razvitiya gorodskikh territoriy [Concept Development of Support System of Decision Making on Ecological Safety of City Area Development]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta [Internet Proceedings of Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering]. 2011, no. 25, pp. 427—432.
  14. Khaynish S.V. Menedzhment i biznes v slabostrukturirovannom mire: Aktual’nye secheniya, paradoksy, resheniya (iz opyta upravlencheskogo konsul’tirovaniya) [Management and Business in Poorly Structures World: Current Sections, Paradoxes, Solutions (According to the Experience of Management Consulting)]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2014, 704 p. (In Russian)
  15. Kerzner H. Project Management Metrics, KPIs, And Dashboards: A Guide to Measuring and Monitoring Project Performance. Wiley, 2011, 379 p.
  16. Pyhrr S.A., Born W.L., Webb J.R. Development of a Dynamic Investment Strategy under Alternative Inflation Cycle Scenarios. Journal of Real Estate Research. 1990, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 177—194.
  17. Krushlinskiy V.I., Sarchenko V.I. Genplan i kachestvo sredy goroda [General Layout and City Environment Quality]. Krasnoyarsk, SFU Publ., 2014, 122 p. (In Russian)
  18. Smart S.B., Gitman L.J., Joehnk M.D. Fundamentals of Investing. 12th edition. 2013, Prentice Hall, 672 p.
  19. Friedman J.P., Ordway N. Income Property Appraisal and Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall, 1989, 474 p.
  20. Schmitz A., Peck S., Engebretson P. The New Shape of Suburbia. Trends in Residential Development. Washington, D.C., ULI — the Urban Land Institute, 2003, 221 p.

Download

Cyclic “deja vu” of real estate industry development paradigms

Vestnik MGSU 1/2015
  • Yas’kova Natal’ya Yur’evna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Department of Economy and Management in the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 112-119

The practical projections of cyclic theories are of a great interest. Our preferences moved again from apartment houses and vertical cities to low-rise buildings. Circles set the development vector for natural, human sciences and sciences on society. The article researches the problem of cyclic development of scientific schools and their innovation ideas in the sphere of space-territory property development. The phases of the cycle were researched on the example of Bauhaus architecture school. This enables to reveal the demands and specifics of the development of new technological platforms, as well as to create the effective formats of public-private partnership. Cyclicity of business activity development under the conditions of awareness of the evolution of senses of interdisciplinary approaches utilization permits to produce the adequate development paradigm.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.1.112-119

References
  1. Yas’kova N.Yu., Sergeev I.M., Polinov A.A. Nezavershennoe stroitel’stvo i virtual’nyy ekonomicheskiy rost [Construction in Progress and Virtual Economic Growth]. Ekonomika stroitel’stva [Construction Economy]. 2004, no. 8, pp. 2—13. (In Russian)
  2. Yas’kova N.Yu. Tendentsii razvitiya stroitel’nykh korporatsiy v novykh usloviyakh [Development Trends of Construction Corporations in New Environment]. Nauchnoe obozrenie [Scientific Review]. 2013, no. 6, pp. 174—178. (In Russian)
  3. Yas’kova N.Yu. Razvitie kontseptual’nykh polozheniy upravleniya protsessami investitsionno-stroitel’noy deyatel’nosti [Development of Conceptual Provisions of Process Management in Investment and Construction Activities]. Vestnik IrGTU [Bulletin of Irkutsk State Technical University]. 2012, no. 11(70), pp. 278—280. (In Russian)
  4. Droste M. Baukhauz (1919—1933). Reforma i avangard [Bauhaus Bauhaus 1919—1933. Reform and Avant-garde]. Translated from French by Yu.Yu. Kotova. Moscow, Art-Rodnik Publ., 2008, 96 p. (In Russian)
  5. Kharshak M. «Baukhaus» — mesto, gde rodilsya dizayn [Bauhaus — a Place Where Design Was Born]. Advertology.Ru. Available at: http://www.advertology.ru/article13833.html. Date of access: 15.12.2014. (In Russian)
  6. Gropius W. Granitsy arkhitektury [Boundaries of Architecture]. Translated from English by A.S. Pinsker, V.R. Aronov, V.G. Kalish. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1971, 286 p. (In Russian)
  7. Samin K.D. 100 velikikh arkhitektorov [100 Grear Architects]. Moscow, Veche Publ., 2001, 385 p. (In Russian)
  8. Rakhmanova A. Baukhauz 90 let spustya [Bauhaus 90 Years Later]. Deutsсhe Welle. 2009. Available at: http://dw.de/p/HMNP/. Date of access: 15.12.2014. (In Russian)
  9. Yakobi A., Khartman G., Dendra G. Baukhauz segodnya : lektsiya v ramkakh programmy OVERVIEWM [Bauhaus Today : a Lecture in Frames of the Program OVERVIEWM]. Vysshaya shkola arkhitektury Dessau [Higher School of Architecture DIA]. Transkated from German by O.T. Ivanova. 2008. Available at: http://archi.ru/events/1490/vysshaya-shkola-arhitektury-dessau-dia-bauhaus-segodnya-alfred-yakobi-gunnart-hartman-daniel-dendra-germaniya/. Date of access: 15.12.2014. (In Russian)
  10. Koveshnikova N.A. Dizayn: istoriya i teoriya [Design: History and Theory]. Moscow, Omega-L Publ., 2009, 224 p. (In Russian)
  11. Meyer H. Bauen und Gesellschaft. Schriften, Briefe, Projekte. Dresden, VEB Verlag der Kunst Dresden, 1980, 412 s.
  12. Semina A. Obratim remeslo na blago iskusstva [Let Us Turn Craft for the Benefit of Art]. Daydzhest nedvizhimosti [Real Estate Digest]. 2014, no. 8 (95), pp. 59—64. (In Russian)
  13. Kuznetsov O.L., Bol'shakov B.E. Ustoychivoe razvitie: universal'nyy printsip sinteza estestvennykh, tekhnicheskikh i sotsial'nykh znaniy [Sustainable Development: The Universal Principle of the Synthesis of Natural, Technical and Social Knowledge]. Ustoychivoe razvitie: nauka i praktika [Sustainable Development: Science and Practice]. 2009, no. 1 (2), pp. 1—12. (In Russian)
  14. Yas’kova N.Yu. Mekhanizmy investirovaniya v ustoychivoe razvitie [Mechanisms of Investing in Sustainable Development]. Ekonomika stroitel’stva [Construction Economy]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 40—45 (In Russian)
  15. Yas’kova N.Yu., Matveeva M.V. Innovatsionnyy fokus investitsionnoy deyatel’nosti v ramkakh modernizatsii natsional’noy ekonomiki [Innovative Focus of Investment Activity in the Framework of National Economy Modernization]. Ekonomichniy chasopis-XXI [Economy Journal-21]. 2014, vol. 1, no. 1—2, pp. 42—45. (In Russian)

Download

The sixtieth anniversary of volgograd state university of architecture and civil engineering. History of the landmark

Vestnik MGSU 9/2012
  • Kalashnikov Sergey Yurevich - Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (VSUACE) Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Rector, Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (VSUACE), 1 Akademicheskaya St., Volgograd, 400074, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Oleynikov Petr Petrovich - Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (VSUACE) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associated Professor, Dean, Department of Architecture, Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (VSUACE), 1 Akademicheskaya St., Volgograd, 400074, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Oleynikova Elena Petrovna - Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (VSUACE) student, Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (VSUACE), 1 Akademicheskaya St., Volgograd, 400074, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 8 - 17

Historic events associated with the location of Volgograd State University of Architecture
and Civil Engineering, peculiarities of its architectural and planning solutions, urban planning solutions
implemented in the initial plan of the town of Tsaritsyn, approved by the Russian Emperor
in 1820, are considered in the article. Attributes of buildings and structures adjacent to the buildings
of the future University in the period of formation of Eletskaya, Kashirskaya, Dubovskaya, and
Kolomenskaya streets are demonstrated by the authors.
The authors provide information concerning the institutions and organizations accommodated
in the building formerly owned by merchant Shlykov (Building A of Volgograd State University of
Architecture and Civil Engineering) in the period between the completion of its construction and
1952, when the Institute of Engineers of Municipal Economy was founded. They included a nonclassical
secondary school, a teacher training seminary, Stalingrad Exemplary Teacher Training
College and College of Utility Providers.
Photographs of buildings and structures constructed next to the building of the future University
of Architecture and Civil Engineering are provided. The authors also cover the problem of destruction
of multiple buildings in the Voroshilov district during the battle of Stalingrad. Architects and
authors of projects designated for the restructuring of existing and construction of new buildings of
the University in 1940-1990 are enlisted in the article.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2012.9.8 - 17

References
  1. Semenov V.P., editor. Ososkov P.A., Korostelev N.A., Gavrilov N.G., Syirnev N.N. Limanskiy V.I., general manager. Rossiya. Polnoe geografi cheskoe opisanie nashego Otechestva. Nastol’naya i dorozhnaya kniga dlya russkikh lyudey [Russia. Complete Geographical Description of Our Homeland. Desktop and Road Book for the Russian People], vol. 6. Srednee i Nizhnee Povolzh’e i Zavolzh’e [Middle and Lower Volga and Trans-Volga Regions], 1901.
  2. Vyaz’min A.M., Oleynikov P.P. Arkhitektory Volgograda [Architects of Volgograd]. Volgograd, Izdatel’ Publ., 2003, p. 234.
  3. Golovkin G.M. Vremya i lyudi. Ocherki istorii VolgGASU. [Time and People. Essays about the History of VSUACE]. Volgograd, 2007, ch. 1, p. 68.

Download

Results 1 - 5 of 5