INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

Valuation of organizational and technological capacity of a building project formed on the basis of information flows

Vestnik MGSU 11/2015
  • Lapidus Azariy Abramovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Professor, Doctor of Technical Sciences, chair, Department of Technology and Management of the Construction, Honored Builder of the Russian Federation, Recipient of the Prize of the Russian Federation Government in the field of Science and Technology, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Fel’dman Aleksandr Olegovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) postgraduate student, Department of Technology and Management of the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 193-201

At the modern stage of construction branch development there is a current task of forming the indicator, the application of which will allow forecasting the final indicator of a construction project depending on organizational-technological and management solutions influencing it - the organizational and technological capacity of a construction project. The construction project capacity, which has been actively investigated in the recent years, is formed on the basis of account for the processes directly or tangentially related to production and technological specifics of the construction industry on all the stages of project development: design solutions, preparation of a construction site, general construction and finishing works, special works (building water supply and water disposal systems, technological equipment, electric wiring and low currents, ventilation, conditioning and fire security, elevators), external supply lines, amenities. The introduction of organizational-technological capacity concept of a building project in the form of a numerical integral value is given in the article, allowing to make relevant management decisions at any step of the construction project. The article deals with the essence of information flows as an important component in the construction project evaluation. The authors discuss the separation of information flows into groups, depending on different criteria. As a result, the mathematical model is offered, which gives the construction project potential evaluation with taking into account the impact of information flows.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.11.193-201

References
  1. Lapidus A.A., Demidov L.P. Issledovanie faktorov, vliyayushchikh na pokazatel’ potentsiala stroitel’noy ploshchadki [Investigation of the Factors Influencing the Potential Indicator of a Construction Site]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014, no. 4, pp. 160—166. (In Russian)
  2. Maksimov A.A. Struktura informatsionnykh potokov sovremennogo promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [Structure of Informational Flows of a Contemporary Industrial Enterprise]. Informatsionnye resursy Rossii [Informational Resources of Russia]. 2005, no. 5. Available at: http://www.aselibrary.ru/datadocs/doc_316gi.pdf. (In Russian)
  3. Arnorsson H. Optimizing the Information Flow on the Construction Site. Master’s Thesis, Aalborg University, 2012, pp. 76—79.
  4. Minko I.S., Kryakov P.N. Organizatsiya informatsionnykh potokov v innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti [Organization of Information Flows in Innovative Activity]. Nauchnyy zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya: Ekonomika i ekologicheskiy menedzhment [Scientific Journal NRU ITMO Series “Economics and Environmental Management”]. 2014, no. 1, article 51. (In Russian)
  5. Saydaev Kh.L.-A. Metodika vybora stroitel’noy kompanii v ramkakh organizatsii tendera na osnove rascheta kompleksnogo pokazatelya rezul’tativnosti [Methodology of Choosing a Construction Company for Tender on the Basis of Estimating Complex Efficiency Index]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2013, no. 10, pp. 266—271. (In Russian)
  6. Marugin V.M., Azgal’dov G.G. Kvalimetricheskaya ekspertiza stroitel’nykh ob”ektov [Qualimetric Inspection of Construction Objects]. Saint Petersburg, Politekhnika Publ., 2008, 527 p. (In Russian)
  7. Lapidus A.A., Govorukha P.A. Organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskiy potentsial ograzhdayushchikh konstruktsiy mnogoetazhnykh zhilykh zdaniy [Organizational and Technological Potential of Enveloping Structures of Multi-Storeyed Residential Buildings]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2015, no. 4, pp. 143—149. (In Russian)
  8. Lapidus A.A. Instrument operativnogo upravleniya proizvodstvom — integral’nyy potentsial effektivnosti organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskikh i upravlencheskikh resheniy stroitel’nogo ob”ekta [Tools of Production Scheduling — an Integral Efficiency Potential of Organizational, Technological and Management Solutions of a Construction Object]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2015, no. 1, pp. 97—102. (In Russian)
  9. Fel’dman A.O. Optimizatsiya organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskogo potentsiala stroitel’nogo proekta formiruemogo na osnove informatsionnykh potokov [Optimization of Organizational-Technological [Optimization of Organizational-Technological Capacity of a Construction Project Formed Basing on Informational Flows]. Tekhnologiya i organizatsiya stroitel’nogo proizvodstva [Technology and Organization of Construction Production]. 2014—2015, no. 4/no. 1 (9), pp. 52—53. (In Russian)
  10. Berezhnyy A.Yu. Formirovanie informatsionnoy bazy dannykh dlya sistemy otsenki ekologicheskoy effektivnosti organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskikh resheniy v protsesse stroitel’nogo proizvodstva [Formation of Informational Database for Evaluation System of Ecological Efficiency of Organizational and Technological Solutions in the Process of Construction Production]. Tekhnicheskoe regulirovanie. Stroitel’stvo, proektirovanie i izyskaniya [Technical Regulation. Construction, Design and Research]. 2012, no. 1, pp. 42—43. (In Russian)
  11. Kononykhin B.D., Potapenko A.I. Novoe napravlenie v sozdanii sredstv informatsionnogo obespecheniya v stroitel’stve [New Trend in Creation of Information Support Means in the Construction]. Mekhanizatsiya stroitel’stva [Mechanization of the Construction]. 2006, no. 9, pp. 17—18. (In Russian)
  12. Bokova O.V. Sovremennye trebovaniya k informatsionnym sistemam obespecheniya ustoychivoy deyatel’nosti stroitel’nogo predpriyatiya [Modern Requirements to Information Systems of Providing Stable Operation of a Construction Enterprise]. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo [Industrial and Civil Engineering]. 2007, no. 10, p. 32. (In Russian)
  13. Sergeev V.I. Korporativnaya logistika — upravlenie zapasami [Corporative Logistics — Materials Management]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2005, p. 150. (In Russian)
  14. Fursov I.G. Upravlenie informatsiey — vazhneyshiy biznes-resurs sovremennogo predpriyatiya [Information Management — the Most Important Business-resourse of a Modern Enterprise]. Stroitel’nye materialy, oborudovanie, tekhnologii XXI veka [Construction Materials, Equipment, Technologies of the 21st Century]. 2005, no. 1, pp. 56—57. (In Russian)
  15. Magomedov M.Yu., Khalimbekov Kh. Osnovnye printsipy postroeniya informatsionnoy sistemy upravleniya stroitel’nogo predpriyatiya [Main Principles of Information System Creation of a Construction Enterprise Management]. Ekonomika stroitel’stva [Construction Economy]. 2005, no. 4, pp. 13—22. (In Russian)
  16. Maslova I.A. Organizatsiya vzaimodeystviya programmnogo obespecheniya na stroitel’nom predpriyatii [Organizing the Interaction of Software in a Construction Enterprise]. Stroitel’stvo: nalogooblozhenie, bukhuchet [Construction: Taxation, Accounting]. 2007, no. 1, pp. 27—32. (In Russian)
  17. Bessonov A.K., Verstina N.G., Kulakov Yu.N. Innovatsionnyy potentsial stroitel’nykh predpriyatiy: formirovanie i ispol’zovanie v protsesse innovatsionnogo razvitiya [Innovational Potential of Construction Companies: Formation and Use in the Process of Innovational Development]. Moscow, ASV Publ., 2009, 166 p. (In Russian)
  18. Kotlyarov I.D. Klassifikatsiya veb-predstavitel’stv po stepeni avtomatizatsii obrabotki informatsionnykh potokov [Classification of Web-Representatives According to the Degree of Automation of Information Flows Processing]. Informatsionnye resursy Rossii [Informational Resources of Russia]. 2012, no. 5, pp. 18—21. (In Russian)
  19. Menyaev M.F. Informatsionnye potoki v sisteme upravleniya [Information Flows in Management System]. Nauka i obrazovanie [Science and Education]. 2011, no. 5, pp. 1—4. (In Russian)
  20. Merzlyak A.V. Strukturizatsiya informatsionnykh potokov dlya sovershenstvovaniya upravleniya logisticheskimi sistemami [Structuring of Information Flows for Improvement of Logistic Systems Management]. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie problemy modernizatsii sovremennogo obshchestva : kollektivnaya monografiya [Social and Economic Problems of Modern Society Modernization : Multi-authored Monograph]. Saint Petersburg, NPK «ROST» Publ., 2011, pp. 611—617. (In Russian)

Download

Methodological approaches to assessing the innovativeness level of investment and construction projects

Vestnik MGSU 2/2015
  • Dolzhenko Yuliya Aleksandrovna - Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE); LLC “K4” postgraduate student, Department of Projects and Programs Management; chief specialist, Systems Analysis Group, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE); LLC “K4”, 36 Stremyannyy pereulok, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation; 2/4-17 Luzhnetskaya naberezhnaya, Moscow, 119270, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 178-186

The article presents the results of the analysis of the existing approaches to innovations evaluation in international and Russian practice. The authors examine the nature of the concept of “innovation”, especially innovation projects, methodological tools to measure various objects’ innovativeness level as well as innovative project economic efficiency assessing methods. It should be noted that at the legislative level up to date in the process of formation and implementation of capital construction projects there are no eligible requirements and assistance from public authorities to the developer for creating innovative products, providing the appropriate level of services. And if the financial indicators of the project are more or less clear, the level of innovativeness of them is much more complicated, although the requirements on the innovativeness of the projects are included in the Strategy of innovative development of Russia. The analysis shows that in Russian and international practice there are many approaches to assessing innovations, but they cannot be considered universal and they are applied differentially depending on the goals and tasks of applying the results of scientific achievements in the form of intellectual property to improve the efficiency and competitiveness of industries, products, services. In this case individual, specific evaluation method is selected and implemented basing on taking into account all the legal, economic, technical and other aspects. As a result, the author concluded that the innovativeness level rating requires development, which is in its analytical capabilities to provide flexible management tool, which can be applied at all the stages of the investment and construction project life cycle.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.2.178-186

References
  1. Arbatskaya E.A. Podkhody k otsenke konkurentosposobnosti predpriyatiya [Approaches to Assess the Competitiveness of an Enterprises]. Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii [News of Irkutsk State Economic Academy]. 2012, no. 1 (81), pp. 118—128. (In Russian)
  2. Bachurina S.S., Dolzhenko Yu.A. Innovatsionnaya sostavlyayushchaya dostizheniya strategicheskogo konkurentnogo preimushchestva kompanii [An Innovative Component of Achieving Strategic Competitive Advantage of a Company]. Sovremennye problemy upravleniya proektami v investitsionno-stroitel'noy sfere i prirodopol'zovanii: materialy III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (12 aprelya 2013 g.) [Modern Problems of Management of Investment Projects in Construction and Environmental Management: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific and Practical Conference (April 12, 2013)]. Edited by V.I. Resin. Moscow, REU im. G.V. Plekhanova Publ., 2013, pp. 7—12. (In Russian)
  3. Sukhachev K.A., Sultanova I.P., Dolzhenko Yu.A. Novye tekhnologii upravleniya kak sredstvo resheniya problem stroitel’stva energeticheskikh ob”ektov [New Management Technologies as Means of Solving the Problems of Energy Facilities Construction]. Neftegazopromyslovyy inzhiniring [Oil and Gas Engineering]. 2013, Special issue no. 7, pp. 62—66. (In Russian)
  4. Batukova L.R. Otsenka urovnya innovatsionnosti investitsionnykh proektov [Innovativeness Level Assessment of Investment Projects]. Regionologiya [Regional Studies]. 2010, no. 3, pp. 59—68. (In Russian)
  5. Chekcheeva N.V., Uvarov A.F., Osipov Yu.M. Metodika ekspertizy innovatsionnykh proektov [Methods of Examination Of Innovative Projects]. Innovatsii [Innovations]. 2006, no. 9, pp. 114—116. (In Russian)
  6. Rot E. Innovatsii — put’ k povysheniyu effektivnosti [Innovations — the Path to Greater Efficiency]. Vestnik McKinsey [Bulletin Of McKinsey]. 2010, no. 21, pp. 37—51. (In Russian)
  7. Vaccaro I.G., Jansen J.P., Van Den Bosch F.A.J., Volberda H.W. Management Innovation and Leadership: The Moderating Role of Organizational Size. Journal of Management Studies. 2012, no. 49 (1), pp. 28—51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00976.x.
  8. Kock A., Gemünden H.G., Salomo S., Schultz S. The Mixed Blessings of Technological Innovativeness for the Commercial Success of New Products. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2011, no. 28, issue s1, pp. 28—43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00859.x.
  9. Tsai K.H., Fang W., Hsu T.T. Relinking Cross-Functional Collaboration, Knowledge Integration Mechanisms and Product Innovation Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sci. 2012, no. 29, issue 1, pp. 25—39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjas.192.
  10. Dereli T., Altun K. A Novel Approach for Assessment of Candidate Technologies with Respect to Their Innovation Potentials: Quick Innovation Intelligence Process. Expert Systems with Applications. 2013, 40 (3), pp. 881—891. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.044.
  11. Lasagni A. How Can External Relationships Enhance Innovation in SMEs? New Evidence for Europe. Journal of Small Business Management. 2012, no. 50 (2), pp. 310—339. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00355.x.
  12. Batukova L.R. Innovatsionnost’, kak vazhneyshaya sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya kategoriya [Innovation as the Most Important Socio-Economic Category]. Problemy: perspektivy razvitiya innovatsionno-kreativnoy ekonomiki : Sbornik materialov Vtoroy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Collection of Materials of the Second International Scientific-Practical Conference “Innovative and Creative Economy Development Problems and Prospects”]. 2010. Available at: http://econference.ru/blog/conf06/216.html. Date of access: 25.12.2014. (In Russian)
  13. Baklanova Yu.O. Tipologizatsiya, klassifikatsiya i sistematizatsiya innovatsionnykh proektov i initsiativ v kompanii [Classification, Grouping and Systematization of Innovational Projects and Initiatives in a Company]. Sovremennye tekhnologii upravleniya [Modern Management Technologies]. 2012, no. 4 (16). Available at: http://sovman.ru/all-numbers/archive-2012/april2012/item/82-typology-classification-and-systematization-of-innovative-projects-and-initiatives-in-the-company.html. (In Russian)
  14. Baklanova Yu.O. Evolyutsiya podkhoda k proektnomu upravleniyu innovatsiyami: initsiativa, proekt, programma, portfel’ [Evolution of the Approach to Project Management, Innovation, Initiative, Project, Program, Portfolio]. Sovremennye tekhnologii upravleniya [Modern Management Technologies]. 2012, no. 3 (15). Available at: http://sovman.ru/all-numbers/archive-2012/march2012/item/72-03-03-12.html. Date of access: 25.12.2014. (In Russian)
  15. Komkov N.I., Eroshkin S.Yu., Mamontova N.G. «Dorozhnaya karta» — kak instrument tekhnologicheskogo prognozirovaniya i analiza innovatsionnykh proektov [“Road Map” as a Tool of Technological Forecasting and Analysis of Innovative Projects]. Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyaystvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN [Scientific Works: the Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2008, no. 6, pp. 242—265. (In Russian)
  16. Panchenko V.Ya. RFFI — klyuchevoy element obespecheniya zapuska innovatsionnogo tsikla [RFBR — a Key Element of the Launch of the Innovation Cycle]. Novaya ekonomika. Innovatsionnyy portret Rossii [The New Economy. Innovative Portrait of Russia]. 2013, pp. 62—66. (In Russian)
  17. Sadkov V.G., Mashegov P.N., Zbinyakova E.A. Otsenka urovnya innovatsionnosti ekonomiki i klyuchevye napravleniya formirovaniya tselostnoy mnogourovnevoy natsional’noy innovatsionnoy sistemy [Economy Innovativeness Level Assessment and the Key Areas of Developing a Comprehensive Multi-Level National Innovation System]. Innovatsionnyy Vestnik Region [Innovative Herald Region]. 2006, no 1., pp. 49—53. (In Russian)
  18. Sarkin A.V. Razrabotka sistemy upravleniya innovatsionnoy deyatel’nost’yu na naukoemkikh mashinostroitel’nykh predpriyatiyakh [Development of Innovation Management Systems in Knowledge-Intensive Machine-Building Enterprises]. Ekonomika i finansy [Economics and Finance]. 2010, no. 8, pp. 32—39. (In Russian)
  19. Sarkin A.V. Primenenie sistemy sbalansirovannykh pokazateley v sisteme planirovaniya na naukoemkikh mashinostroitel’nykh predpriyatiyakh [Application of Balanced Scorecard in the Planning System at the High-Tech Machine-Building Enterprises]. Ekonomika i finansy [Economics and Finance]. 2010, no. 7, pp. 14—29. (In Russian)
  20. Chetverik N.P., Khanukhov Kh.M., Pirotskaya L.M., Grunin I.Yu., Shlyapni- kov A.A., Derevyanko A.A. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po otsenke effektivnosti innovatsiy v stroitel’stve [Guidelines for the Innovation Effectiveness Evaluation in Construction]. Moscow, Komitet innovatsionnykh tekhnologiy v stroitel’stve NOSTROY Publ., 2011, 66 p. (In Russian)

Download

Results 1 - 2 of 2