ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES

Optimization of design-related procedures of the customer authorities

Vestnik MGSU 9/2012
  • Golovin Sergey Viktorovich - Institute for Executives and Specialists of Value Engineering (ANO DPO ISI) consultant, Institute for Executives and Specialists of Value Engineering (ANO DPO ISI), Building 1, 95 Prospekt Mira, Moscow, 129085, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 203 - 208

Currently, the scope of construction works remains highly dependent on public investments. In
turn, investment resources do not always contemplate specific results within pre-set deadlines and
pursuant to the pre-set parameters. The activities of public services in charge of investment projects hat involve construction operations, are composed of several interrelated processes that are as
complex as the processes that are typical for business enterprises, even if the minimal number of
production-related functions is taken into consideration.
The author drives attention to the relevance of optimization of the work performed by the state
customer, since the number of assignments to be performed cannot be covered by the existing organizational
and economic means. The state customer can improve its performance if its organizations
adopt the experience of the top market companies. The best practices to be assimilated include the
benchmarking process, as well as the processes of reengineering and redesign. These technologies
are widely known abroad, although they are not adequately represented in the Russian practice.
They are not applied by the agencies responsible for master plans and investment plans. At the
same time, these procedures may bring specific and measurable positive results. Therefore, there
is a strong potential for further scientific research to be performed in this field.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2012.9.203 - 208

References
  1. Anufriev S.S. Regulirovanie sistem regional’nogo gosudarstvennogo zakaza: vozmozhnosti korruptsionnogo protivodeystviya [Regulation of Systems of Regional State Orders: Resistance to Corruption]. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional Economy: Theory and Practice]. 2010, no. 37(172), pp. 34—38.
  2. Kankhva V.S. Formirovanie mekhanizma obespecheniya i povysheniya ekonomicheskoy ustoychivosti [Formation of the Mechanism Designated for the Assurance and Improvement of the Economic Stability]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2011, no. 6, pp. 161—167.
  3. Lukinova L.I. K voprosu ob otsenke konkurentosposobnosti predpriyatiya [Assessment of the Competitive Strength of an Enterprise]. Aktual’nye voprosy ekonomiki, prava, psikhologii, pedagogiki i sotsiologii v global’nom mire [Relevant Issues of Economy, Law, Psychology, Pedagogics and Sociology in the Global World]. Collection of scientific articles contributed to the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Volgograd, 28-29 February, 2012. Volgogradskoe nauchnoe izdatel’stvo publ., 2012, pp. 130—134.
  4. Ekonomika perekhodnogo perioda. Ocherki ekonomicheskoy politiki postkommunisticheskoy Rossii. Ekonomicheski rost 2000—2007. [Economy of the Transition Period. Essays about the Economic Policy of the Post-Communist Russia. The Economic Advance of 2000—2007.] Moscow, Delo ANKh Publ., 2008.
  5. Yas’kova N.Yu., Karasik D.M. Programmno-tselevye metody razvitiya stroitel’stva. Sovremennyy format gorodskikh tselevykh programm [Programme-oriented Methods of Construction Development. Contemporary Format of Target-Oriented Urban Development Programs]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2012, no. 3, pp. 182—187.
  6. Yas’kova N.Yu., Silka D.N. Upravlenie investitsionno-stroitel’noy deyatel’nost’yu v tsiklicheskoy dinamike [Management of Investment and Construction Activities in Its Cyclical Motion]. Moscow, MGSU Publ., 2011.
  7. Rostovtseva Yu.V. Prognozirovanie i planirovanie kak funktsional’nye elementy sistemy upravleniya [Projecting and Planning as Functional Elements of the Management System]. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta upravleniya [Proceedings of the State University of Management]. 2009, no. 12, pp. 185—189.
  8. Fukolova Yu., Shelukhin I., Belov A. Benchmarking: vse luchshee — sebe [Benchmarking: Getting All the Best]. Sekret fi rmy [Corporate Secret]. 2002, no. 1, pp. 25—28.
  9. Kharrington D., Esseling K., Nimvegen X. Optimizatsiya biznes-protsessov. Dokumentirovanie, analiz, upravlenie, optimizatsiya. [Optimization of Business Processes: Documentation, Analysis, Management, Optimization]. St.Petersburg, 2002.
  10. Shirokova G.V., Nodel”man V.A. Opyt vnedreniya protsessnogo podkhoda pri podgotovke k sertifikatsii po standartu ISO 9000 (na primere kompanii «RASTRO») [Practical Implementation of the Process-based Approach in the Course of Preparation for the Certification pursuant to the ISO 9000 Standard (Exemplifi ed by RASTRO Company]. Vestnik S.-Peterb. un-ta. Ser. Menedzhment. [Proceedings of St.Petersburg University. Management Series]. 2002, no.. 2, pp. 18—22.

Download

Assessment of interaction between supervisory and executive elements of building programmes

Vestnik MGSU 9/2012
  • Kopelchuk Stanislav Yulevich - U.M.E.K. Limited Liability Company consultant, U.M.E.K. Limited Liability Company, 71 Profsoyuznaya st., Moscow, 117342, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 209 - 213

The management of state-funded building programmes has a very high value in the present-day
volatile market. State budget proceeds cover the vast majority of construction projects. Improvement
of efficiency of interaction between the parties involved in this process is critical to the economic stability.
Federal programmes and projects managed by public corporations are among the main tools
applied to these investments. In this regard, the author identifies the areas of interaction and analyses
the link between the supervisory and executive elements of building programmes on the basis of the
principle of the feedback assessment. Feedback is an essential concept of the systems theory.
According to the results of this analysis, the author proposes methods of identification and
elimination of drawbacks in the operation of planning authorities. The planning procedure is to be
based on the scientific research with account for the main objectives of programmes and ancillary
servicing processes, material, human and financial resources. The findings of the author are applied
as the basis for the proposals designated for the improvement of investment management systems,
if funded from federal and regional budgets.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2012.9.209 - 213

References
  1. Agaptsov S.A., Fomin P.A., Shakhovskaya L.S., Mordvintseva A.I. Indikativnoe planirovanie kak osnova strategicheskogo razvitiya promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [Indicative Planning as the Basis for Strategic Development of an Industrial Enterprise]. Moscow, Vyssh. shk. publ., 2002, pp. 125 — 130.
  2. Anokhin A.M., Blachev R.N., Gusev V.B., Pavel’ev V.V. Modeli indikativnogo planirovaniya sotsial’nogo i ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona [Models of Indicative Planning of the Social and Economic Development of a Region]. Moscow, Institute of Management Problems named after V.A. Trapeznikov, RAN Publ., 2005, pp. 45—49.
  3. Kayl’ Ya.Ya. Okazanie gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal’nykh uslug v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sostoyanie, problemy, perspektivy [Provision of State and Municipal Services in the Russian Federation: Status, Problems, Prospects]. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional Economy: Theory and Practice]. 2011, no. 28 (211), pp. 48—55.
  4. Silka D.N. Printsipy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya tsiklami delovoy aktivnosti v stroitel’stve [Principles of State Management of Business Cycles in Construction]. Moscow, MGSU Publ., 2012, pp. 45 — 49.
  5. Kiselev S.A. Sovershenstvovanie deyatel’nosti natsional’nykh institutov razvitiya [Improvement of Operations of National Development Institutions]. Vestnik universiteta: Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya [Proceeding of the University: State University of Management]. 2011, no. 10, pp. 196 — 198.
  6. Il’ina M.V. Protsessnyy podkhod k upravleniyu v stroitel’stve v ramkakh federal’noy kontraktnoy sistemy [Process-based Approach to Construction Management within the Framework of the System of Federal Contracts]. Vestnik universiteta: Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya [Proceeding of the University: State University of Management]. 2011, no. 21, pp. 161—163.
  7. Samosudov M.V. Klassifikatsiya resursov dlya biznesa [Classifi cation of Business Resources]. Vestnik universiteta: Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya [Proceeding of the University: State University of Management]. 2011, no. 21, pp. 204—207.
  8. Trachenko M.B. Printsipy byudzhetirovaniya v sisteme tsentralizovannykh i detsentralizovannykh finansov [Principles of Budgeting within the System of Centralized and Decentralized Finances]. Vestnik universiteta: Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya [Proceeding of the University: State University of Management]. 2011, no. 22, pp. 214—217.
  9. Matserin I.N. Regional’naya innovatsionnaya politika i instrumenty ee realizatsii [Regional Policy of Innovations and Instruments for Its Implementation]. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional Economy: Theory and Practice]. 2011, no. 16 (199), pp. 49—52.
  10. Nabiev P.T. Sovershenstvovanie metodiki otsenki effektivnosti gosudarstvennoy podderzhki malogo biznesa [Improvement of the Methodology of Assessment of Effi ciency of the State Support of Small Business Enterprises]. Collected papers of Scientific and Practical Conference “Relevant Issues of Economics, Law, Psychology, Pedagogics and Sociology in the Global World”. Volgograd, 28—29 February, 2012. Volgograd, Volgogradskoe nauchnoe izdatel’stvo publ., 2012, pp. 167—169.

Download

Results 1 - 2 of 2