ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND EXAMINATION OF BUILDINGS. SPECIAL-PURPOSE CONSTRUCTION

Determining craneways deformations caused by static loads

Vestnik MGSU 4/2015
  • Simonyan Vladimir Viktorovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Engineering Geodesy, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; +7 (499) 183-24-92; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Kuznetsov Oleg Fedorovich - Orenburg State University (OSU) Associate Professor, Department of City Cadastre, Honorable Geodetic Engineer of the RF, Orenburg State University (OSU), 13 prospekt Pobedy, Orenburg, 460018, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 90-95

The most typical types of crane substructures destruction are wear of crane rails, details of its fixation, deformation of crane beams, settlement or tilting of the columns. At technical examination of buildings and structures with crane rails their planned-high-altitude position is determined. There exist a list of methods for determining the crane rails’ planned-high-altitude position, each of them has its disadvantage, expressed in the final result - the real position of crane rails. While estimating their position from the ground, i.e. mounting transit on the ground, and indicating devices above, there is an inaccuracy on the rails, which is caused by different moments of indications fixation, both on the plan and hightwise. The authors carried out observations of the position of craneways both on the plan and heightwise for determining the reason of craneways bearing structures’ deformations and the period of their influence of railtrack state. The results of these observations are analyzed and presented. The authors present their suggestions on advancing the crane operation, which will increase its operation life.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.4.90-95

References
  1. Shekhovtsov G.A., Il’in B.A. Ob otsenke tochnosti opredeleniya krena vysokikh sooruzheniy [On Accuracy Evaluation of Tilting of High Structures]. Promyshlennoe stroitel’stvo [Industrial Engineering]. 1983, no. 2, pp. 27–—28. (In Russian)
  2. Shekhovtsov G.A., Kochetov F.G. Iz opyta kontrolya polozheniya rel’sov podkranovykh putey [From the Experience of Crane Rails Position Control]. Promyshlennoe stroitel’stvo [Industrial Engineering]. 1989, no. 10, pp. 18—22. (In Russian)
  3. Meixner Heinz. Geodezujne pomiaru deformacji. Prz. gorn. 1980, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 540—544. LXII, LXIII, LXIV, LXV.
  4. Shekhovtsov G.A., Shekhovtsova R.P. Sovremennye geodezicheskie metody opredeleniya deformatsiy inzhenernykh sooruzheniy : monografiya [Modern Geodesic Methods for Estimating Deformations of Engineering Structures : Monograph]. N. Novgorod, NNGASU Publ., 2009, 156 p. (In Russian)
  5. Shekhovtsov G.A. Otsenka tochnosti polozheniya geodezicheskikh punktov [Position Accuracy Estimation of Geodetic Points]. Moscow, Nedra Publ., 1992, 255 p. (In Russian)
  6. Shekhovtsov G.A. Sovremennye metody geodezicheskogo kontrolya khodovoy chasti i putey mostovykh kranov [Contemporary Methods of Geodetic Control of the Carrier and Rails of Travelling Cranes]. N. Novgorod, NNGASU Publ., 1999, 164 p. (In Russian)
  7. Shekhovtsov G.A., Shekhovtsova R.P. Ob odnovremennom distantsionnom opredelenii geometrii kranovogo puti i traektorii dvizheniya mostovogo krana [On the Simultaneous Distant Estimation of Crane Track Geometry and Motion Path of Travelling Crane]. Mezhvuzovskiy nauchno-metodickeskiy sbornik [Interuniversity Sciemtific and Methodological Collection]. Saratov, SGTU Publ., 2007, pp. 202—206. (In Russian)
  8. RD 10-138—97. Kompleksnoe obsledovanie kranovykh putey gruzopod”emnykh mashin. Chast’ 1. Obshchie polozheniya. Metodicheskie ukazaniya [Directive Document RD 10-138—97. Complex Inspection of Crane Rails of Lifting Machines. Part 1. General Provisions. Methodology Instructions]. Moscow, Gosgortekhnadzor Rossii Publ., 1997, 38 p. (In Russian)
  9. Shekhovtsov G.A., Shekhovtsova R.P., Akritskaya I.I. Varianty ispol’zovaniya lazernoy ruletki pri ekspertize zdaniy i sooruzheniy [Laser Tape Measure Application Variants at Investigating Buildings and Structures]. Promyshlennaya bezopasnost’ — 2007 : sbornik statey [Industrial Safety — 2007. Collection of Articles]. N. Novgorod, NNGASU Publ., 2007, pp. 52—58. (In Russian)
  10. Monich V.Yu. Metod sputnikovoy geodezii dlya opredeleniya razmera kolei napravlyayushchikh kranovogo puti [Satellite Geodesy Method for Determining the Track Size of the Crane Track Direction]. Bezopasnost’ truda v promyshlennosti [Safety of Work in the Industry]. 2001, no. 1, pp. 46—48. (In Russian)
  11. Fedorov A.I. Metodika i predraschet tochnosti izmereniy pri profilirovanii podkranovykh rel’sovykh putey stantsiey «Profil’ PRP» [Methods and Presettlement of Estimation Accuracy at Profiling Crane Railways by the Station “Profil’ PRP“]. Marksheyderiya i nedropol’zovanie [Mining Geodesy and Subsurface Management]. 2003, no. 4, pp. 57—58. (In Russian)
  12. Shekhovtsov G.A., Kochetov F.G. Iz opyta kontrolya polozheniya rel’sov podkranovykh putey [From the Experience of Crane Rail Position Control]. Promyshlennoe stroitel’stvo [Industrial Engineering]. 1989, no. 10, pp. 18—22. (In Russian)
  13. Arnold R. Eine neue Technologie fur Kranbahn-kontrollmessungen. Vermessungstechnik. 1989, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 52—55.
  14. Janusz W. Wyznaczanie trajektorii ruhu suwnicy i odchytek toru podsuwnicowego ze stanowisk naziemnych. Pr. Jnst. Geod. i kartogr. 1994, vol. 41, no. 89, pp. 31—45.
  15. Shekhovtsov G.A., Shekhovtsova R.P. Peredacha otmetok s ispol’zovaniem lazernoy ruletki [Marks Delivery Using Laser Tape Measure]. Promyshlennaya bezopasnost’ — 2007 : sbornik statey [Industrial Safety — 2007. Collection of Articles]. N. Novgorod, NNGASU Publ., 2007, pp. 59—63. (In Russian)
  16. Soustin V.N. Peredacha otmetok bezotrazhatel’nym dal’nomerom i nivelirom [Marks Delivery by Reflectorless Distance Meter and Level]. Geodeziya i kartografiya [Geodesy and Mapping]. 2001, no. 5, pp. 15—18. (In Russian)
  17. Bryś Henryk. Meßverfahren zum Bestimmen der Geometrie der Verformung von Brückenkran und Kranbahnschienen. Allg. Vermess.-Nachr. 2000, vol. 107, no. 11—12, pp. 391—396.
  18. Schaefer W. Photogrammetrische Beobachtung von Bauwerksverform ungen. Markscheidewesen. 1985, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 148—151.
  19. Schwarz Wilfried. Moderne Messverfahren in der Ingenieurgeodäsie und ihr praktischer Einsatz. Flachenmanag. Und Bodenordn. 2002, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 87—97.
  20. Kuznetsov O.F. Geodezicheskoe obespechenie stroitel’stva i ekspluatatsii sooruzheniy [Geodetic Support of the Construction and Operation of Structures]. Orenburg, Ekspress-pechat’ Publ., 2008, 201 p. (In Russian)

Download

Results 1 - 1 of 1