ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES

Formalized description of assessment procedures of tender offers (of the construction organizer and contracting companies) in case of engineering control scheme

Vestnik MGSU 10/2016
  • Volkov Andrey Anatol’evich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Doctor of Technical Sciences, corresponding member of Russian Academy of Architectural and Construction Sciences, Professor, Department of Information Systems, Technologies and automation in Construction, Rector, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Sborshchikov Sergey Borisovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, acting chair, Department of Technology, Organization and Management in the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Khripko Tat’yana Vladimirovna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Assistant Lecturer, Department of Construction and Theoretical Mechanics, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 105-111

The procedure of evaluating and selecting tender offers is not only an important element of the control system of investment and construction activity but is also an effective tool to increase its efficiency due to optimization of construction works price, reduction of their duration, stimulating innovations in the production, increasing the quality and engineering safety of construction production. At the recent time when new organizational forms and control schemes of investment and construction activity are appearing the system of competitive bidding gains more importance and new functions, because the choice of construction organizer and contracting companies directly influences the results of the construction. The authors consider the task of selecting the bidders’ offers which is a multicriterion task. The offers are evaluated according to the set of parameters reflecting the effectiveness of investment and construction projects. The criteria selection is based on the fact that the proposals of the organizer of construction and the contractors are related to the cost of works and to the deadlines which directly affects the implementation parameters of investment and construction projects.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.10.105-111

Download

Mathematical description of information interaction in investment and construction activities

Vestnik MGSU 5/2014
  • Sborshchikov Sergey Borisovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Doctor of Economical Sciences, Professor, Department of Technology, Management and Administration in the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Lazareva Natal'ya Valer'evna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) assistant, Department of Organization Technology and Management in Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Zharov Yaroslav Vladimirovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) assistant, Department of Technology, Management and Administration in the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 170-175

For effective management of investment and construction activity (ICA) there must be a subsystem responsible for information interaction. The article considers the role of information in ICA, as well as the requirements and objectives of the information systems. Data collection, communication and processing, according to the authors, reflect the system running efficiency. Thanks to information security subsystem there is a possibility of measuring the efficiency of resource use and the relations between inputs and outputs of individual elements throughout investment and construction activities. Requirements of modern economic realities, particularly, investment and construction activities dynamics, should be adjusted to the flow of information: creating new connections, terminating the others. Developing the information management system, its structure and composition require consideration and planning. Development planning and management is closely related to the improvement of information links and upgrading the entire system of information security, its structure and functioning.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.5.170-175

References
  1. Manakov L.F., Faltinskiy R.A. Krizis v investitsionno-stroitel'noy sfere: istoki, ugrozy, novye vozmozhnosti [The Crisis in the Construction Industry Investment: Origins, Threats, New Opportunities]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic Renovation of Russia]. 2009, no. 1, pp. 19—24.
  2. Volkov A.A., Losev Yu.G., Losev K.Yu. Informatsionnaya podderzhka zhiznennogo tsikla ob"ektov stroitel'stva [Information Support of Construction Project Lifecycle]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2012, no. 11, pp. 253—258.
  3. Sborshchikov S.B. Organizatsionnye osnovy ustoychivogo razvitiya energeticheskogo stroitel'stva [Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development of Energy Sector Construction]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2010, no. 4, vol. 2, pp. 363—368.
  4. Volkov A.A., Anikin D.V., Kulikova E.N. Model' interoperabel'nosti korporativnogo informatsionnogo prostranstva stroitel'nykh organizatsiy [Interoperability Model for Corporate Information Space of Construction Companies]. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2012, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 117—121.
  5. Zharov Ya.V. Organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskoe proektirovanie pri realizatsii investitsionno-stroitel'nykh proektov [Process Organization Design within the Framework of Construction Projects]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2013, no. 5, pp. 176—184.
  6. Sborshchikov S.B., Lazareva N.V. Logisticheskoe opisanie sistemy upravleniya investitsionno-stroitel'noy deyatel'nost'yu [Logistic Description of Investment and Construction Management]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014, no. 1, pp. 196—201.
  7. Markasov S.V., Mkrtchyan K.M. Infokommunikatsii i effektivnost' ikh ispol'zovaniya [Infocommunications and Their Effective Use]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic Renovation of Russia]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 24—29.
  8. Zhavoronkov E.P. Resursnyy faktor i logistika v stroitel'stve [Resource Factor and Logistics in Construction]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic Renovation of Russia]. 2006, no. 1, pp. 7—13.
  9. Kostyuchenko V.V., Kudinov D.O. Informatsionnoe obespechenie upravleniya stroitel'nymi sistemami [Data Support of Construction System Management]. Inzhenernyy vestnik Dona [Engineering Proceedings of Don]. 2012, no. 3, pp. 25—30.
  10. Sacks R., Koskela L., Dave B., Owen R. Interaction of Lean and Building Information Modeling in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2010, vol. 136, no. 9, pp. 968—980. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000203.
  11. Dulaimi M.F., Ling F.Y. and Bajracharya A. Organizational Motivation and Inter-Organizational Interaction in Construction Innovation in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics. 2003, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 307—318. DOI:10.1080/0144619032000056144.
  12. Durán R.P., Szymanski M.H. Cooperative Learning Interaction and Construction of Activity. Discourse Processes. 1995, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 149—164. DOI: 10.1080/01638539109544909.
  13. Koo B., Fischer M. Feasibility Study of 4D CAD in Commercial Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2000, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 251—260.
  14. Hage Chehade F., Shahrour I. Numerical Analysis of the Interaction Between Twin-Tunnels: Influence of the Relative Position and Construction Procedure. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 2008, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 210—214. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2007.03.004.
  15. Kuhlthau C.C. The Role of Experience in the Information Search Process of an Early Career Information Worker: Perceptions of Uncertainty, Complexity Construction, and Sources. JASIS. 1999, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 399—412. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:5<399::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-L.

Download

Synergetic scenarios of social and economic development of Russiaand construction management

Vestnik MGSU 5/2015
  • Fokina Zoya Titovna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Candidate of Philosophic Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of History and Philosophy, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, 129337, Moscow, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 122-132

The author examined the variations of Russia’s social and economic development in the following years оn the basis of synergetic scenarios application method. The first scenario is related to the transformation of Russia into raw material resource base and а source of low-cost lаbоur force for the advanced nations of West and East, the loss of the country›s intellectual and cultural potential. The orientation towards innovative, scientific and technical development in the context of modern, post-industrial, information age is associated with the other scenario of social and economic development of Russia. The analysis of the successful experience of scientific and technical development of the USA and the USSR economies as а whole, and of the construction industry as оnе of the important economy directions, is а substantiation for the necessity of new industrialization in Russia, in the context of market and information age. The author advances а statement that Russia in 21st century needs to repeat the positive experience of industrialization and accelerated scientific and technical development of the Soviet Union. The problems facing Russia аrе construction of innovative industrial projects that meet the requirements of the world standards, implementation of largescale national programs, advancement towards the information society. The article emphasizes а thesis about the necessity to manage modern social and economic processes. It focuses the attention of scientists and expert managers оn I. Ansoff’s new management paradigm. The article pays special attention to the matters of modeling the changes in the construction industry complex of Russia, which is one of the most important branches of economy. Two alternative scenarios of the most general changes in construction industry аrе given in it.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.5.122-132

References
  1. Budanov V.G. Metodologiya sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoy nauke i obrazovanii [Methodology of Synergetics in Post-Non-Classical Science and in Education]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2009, pp. 10—20. (In Russian)
  2. Stepin V.S. Samorazvivayushchiesya sistemy i filosofiya sinergetiki [Self-Developing Systems and Philosophy of Synergetics]. Put’ v budushchee — nauka, global’nye problemy, mechty i nadezhdy : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii (26—28 noyabrya 2007) [Path to the Future — Science, Global Issues, Dreams and Hopes: Materials of the International Conference, November 26—28, 2007]. Moscow, Institut prikladnoy matematiki im. M.V. Keldysha RAN Publ., 2007, pp. 15—25. (In Russian)
  3. Bevzenko L.D. Sotsiokul’turnye faktory determinatsii postneklassicheskikh praktik [Social and Cultural Factors of Post-Non-Classical Practices Determination]. Postneklassicheskie praktiki i sotsiokul’turnye transformatsii : materialy Mezhdunarodnogo mezhdistsiplinarnogo seminara [Post-Non-Classical Practices and Sociocultural Transformations :
  4. Materials of International Interdisciplinary Seminar]. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2009,
  5. pp. 29—35. (In Russian)
  6. Rezhabek E.Ya. Sinergeticheskie predstavleniya i sotsial’naya real’nost’ [Synergetic Concepts and Social Reality]. Sinergeticheskaya paradigma: Sotsial’naya sinergetika : sbornik statey [Synergetic Paradigm. Social Synergeics : Collection of Articles]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2009, pp. 37—62. (In Russian)
  7. Ob utverzhdenii prioritetnykh napravleniy razvitiya nauki, tekhnologiy i tekhniki v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i perechnya kriticheskikh tekhnologiy Rossiyskoy Federatsii : Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 7 iyulya 2011 № 889 [Оn Approval of the Priority Directions of Science, Engineering and Technology Development of the Russian Federation and of Russian Federation Critically Important Technologies List : Deсrее of the President of the Russian Federation no. 889 of July 7, 2011]. Ofitsial’nyy internet-portal Prezidenta RF [Official Internet portal of the President of the RF]. Available at: http://graph.document.kremlin.ru/page.aspx?1563800. Date of access: 12.02.2015. (In Russian)
  8. Anisimova A.E., Rakitov A.I., Rusetskaya M.N., Kondrat’ev V.M., Sakharova M.V., compiling editors. Modernizatsiya Rossii: nauka, obrazovanie, vysokie tekhnologii : Tezisy vystupleniy uchastnikov II vserossiyskoy konferentsii po naukovedeniyu (15—17 noyabrya 2010 goda) [Modernization of Russia: Science, Education, Technology. Theses of the Speeches of the Participants of the 2nd AII-Russia Conference оn Science of Science. November 15—17, 2010]. Moscow, MGGU Publ., 2010, 572 p. (In Russian)
  9. Kuzyk B.N., Yakovets Yu.V. Rossiya—2050: strategiya innovatsionnogo proryva [Russia—2050: Strategy for an Innovative Breakthrough]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2004, pp. 95—112. (In Russian)
  10. Korovkin A.G., Akhundova O.V., Dolgova I.N., Klimova N.V., Korolev I.B., Podorvanova Yu.A., Polezhaev A.V. Prognoz sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii: programma issledovaniy [Forecast of Social and Economic Development of Russia: Investigation Program]. Institut narodnokhozyaystvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN [National Economy Forecasting Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2004, pp. 13—21. (In Russian)
  11. Molokova T.A., editor. Praviteli Rossii i razvitie stroitel’stva [Rulers of Russia and Development of Construction]. Moscow, MISI—MGSU Publ., 2012, 295 p. (In Russian)
  12. Strategicheskoe planirovanie i razvitie predpriyatiy : materialy 9-go vserossiyskogo simpoziuma [Strategic Planning and Development of Enterprises. Materials of the 9th AII-Russia Symposium]. Moscow, TsEMI RAN Publ., 2008, pp. 10—25. (In Russian)
  13. Ansoff I. Strategicheskiy menedzhment. Klassicheskoe izdanie [Strategic Management. Classical Edition]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2009, pp. 10—20. (In Russian)
  14. Ansoff I. Novaya korporativnaya strategiya [New Corporate Strategy]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 1999, pp. 15—30. (In Russian)
  15. Gorshkov R.K., Ul’yanova A.V. Organizatsionnye polozheniya po razvitiyu sistemy strategicheskogo upravleniya i planirovaniya na stroitel’nykh predpriyatiyakh malogo i srednego biznesa otrasli [Organizational Statements оn the Development of Strategic Management and Planning System аt Small and Medium Construction Industry Enterprises]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2011, no. 6, pp. 146—154. (In Russian)
  16. Porshnev A.G., Salomatin N.A. Upravlenie organizatsiey [Organization Management]. Moscow, GUU-M Publ., 2009, pp. 8—50. (In Russian)
  17. Vikhanskiy O.S. Strategicheskoe upravlenie [Strategic Management]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 2001, p. 15.
  18. Upravlenie v usloviyakh neopredelennosti [Management in Uncertainty Conditions]. Translated from English. Moscow, Alpina Business Books Publ., 2009, 264 p. (Harvard Business Review) (In Russian)
  19. Upravlenie v usloviyakh krizisa [Management in Crisis Condition]. Translated from English. Moscow, Alpina Business Books Publ., 2005, 256 p. (Harvard Business Review) (In Russian)
  20. Ozdorovlenie biznesa [Improvement of Business]. Translated from English. Moscow, Alpina Business Books Publ., 2006, 172 p. (Harvard Business Review) (In Russian)

Download

A model of organization life cycle of a medical building

Vestnik MGSU 12/2018 Volume 13
  • Dorogan Igor A. - Almaz-SP Director for construction, Almaz-SP, 7 Obraztsova st., Moscow, 127025, Russian Federation.

Pages 1474-1481

Introduction. An approach to the development of the organizational-technological model of the life cycle of a medical facility building is presented. Buildings of medical organizations have a number of features in the design, construction and operation. The buildings of nuclear medicine are subject to particularly high requirements of radiation and fire safety. Materials and methods. To organize the design, construction and maintenance of medical buildings, it is advisable to create and develop an organizational and technological model of the medical building life cycle. Such model was created by the author in the form of a business processes sequence. Confirmation of the effectiveness of the model is carried out with the help of multi-criteria expert evaluation. Results. To solve this problem, it is proposed a number of changes in the order of the investment project carrying. A new element is the Preliminary justification of the requirements for the health facility. It should become a mandatory document when obtaining a town-planning plan of the ground area, which is in Russia a de facto permission to design. It is also proposed to prepare technical requirements of three levels. The first level requirements are used for pre-design stage procedures. The requirements of the second level are included in the medical and technical design assignment. The requirements of the third level are applied to the detailed design, as well as to the construction and maintenance of the facility. Requirements are included in the requirement system and must be checked at key stages of the project. At the preliminary project phase, it is also advisable to make a technical and economic calculation with the justification of the main technical solutions and technical and economic indicators. This document should also include a project management plan. New elements are included in organizational and technological models of different stages of the object life cycle. Conclusions. On the basis of the developed model, it is proposed to make adjustments to the normative guideline used in the construction management. For example, it is necessary to make mandatory documents of the pre-design stage. These works have to be paid by investor therefore the standard of design cost has to be increased.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2018.12.1474-1481

Download

Results 1 - 4 of 4