State order economic efficiency examination
Pages 177-187
The monitoring procedure is an integral part for tracking the results of tendering. It’s also necessary for patterns’ identification to make subsequent legislative adjustments. This article includes the Western experience analysis of the state contracts’ tracking with underlining of its main features. The U.S. Federal contract system includes the Act called «The Office of the U.S. state order», which was adopted in 1974. The Act requires creating a system for collecting information about federal government contracts. It is OMB’s obligation. Federal data bank of the state order was created in 1978. The control system of public procurement procedures, serving in Germany, meets the requirements of the EU, but has certain specifics. All the organizations, which are equated to government customers in accordance with the definition of the European Union, are in the sphere of public procurement procedures’ control system. Thus, the state customer is also a number of private entities. The control system includes two instances: 1) the appellate court, which exists in the form of an independent institution; 2) the court, which exists in the form of a judicial authority. The governmental experts’ and scientists’ organization called “State orders forum” is very effective and popular in Germany. Its members exchange their opinions on new developments in public procurement within the country and abroad. The article includes the analysis of the existing public orders monitoring procedures. Also the laws of procurement implementation, which exists at the stage of bidding and contractual obligations, are highlighted in the article. The consequences of ignoring the existing problems of public order in Russia are systematized. The main drawbacks of the state order control system are identified. In this article the existing public systems of the state order monitoring in Russia are inventoried. The requirement of cardinal processing the format and scope of the information is provided. Also the rules, which should serve as a new base for the state order controlling system, are formulated. What is more, the article includes the Moscow Construction Department as an example of the system tracking the procurement procedures. We offer a hypothetical model of the state order economic examination, based on the resulting data rates: price reduction in tendering; the number of participants in the tendering; execution of the contract term; life cycle costs; the quality of products; the presence of documented violations. Each indicator is assigned an importance factor in achieving the overall efficiency, which is defined by experts with the participation of government customers’. Determination of the complex efficiency index occurs by summing the obtained parameters. The results are obtained. The conclusions are formulated. Thus, the vector of the state order analysis direction from monitoring data to the hypothetical model of efficiency examination is defined.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.10.177-187
- Piskarev A.I. Raschet nachal’noy (maksimal’noy) tseny gosudarstvennogo kontrakta na vypolnenie podryadnyh rabot [Initial (maximum) Contract Price Calculation for the State Order]. Goszakaz [State Order]. 2014, no. 35, pp. 67—73. (in Russian)
- Karpinskaya E.S., Bereza A.O., Bogdanov T. Transfertnoe tsenoobrazovanie v stroiyel’nykh organizatsiyakh [Transfer Pricing of Construction Organizations]. Bukhuchet v stroitel’nykh organizatsiyakh [Accounting in Construction Companies]. 2014, no. 4, pp. 60—71. (in Russian)
- Yas’kova N.Y., Silka D.N., Bakrunov Yu.O. Razvitie investitsionno-stroitel’nykh protsessov v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Development of Investment and Construction Processes in the Globalization Conditions]. Moscow, MAIES Publ., 2009, 520 p. (in Russian)
- Chemerisov M.V. Kontraktnye otnosheniya: mezhdunarodnyy, regional’nyy i korporativnyy opyt [Contractual Relationship: International, Regional and Corporate Experience]. Available at: http://economy.gov.ru/minec/about/structure/depfks/doc20100806_06. Дата обращения: 08.02.2014. (in Russian)
- Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). 2005, vol. 1, 1889 p. Available at: https://acquisition.gov/far/current/pdf/FAR.pdf. Date of access: 01.03.2014.
- Albano G.L., Sparro M. Flexible Strategies for Centralized Public Procurement. Review of Economics and Institutions. 2010, vol. 1, no. 2, art. 4. Available at: http://www.rei.unipg.it/rei/article/view/17. Date of access: 14.02.2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5202/rei.v1i2.17/.
- Brammer S., Walker H. Sustainable Procurement Practices in the Public Sector: An International Comparative Study. University of Bath: School of Management. Working Paper Series. 2007, no. 16. Available at: http://www.bath.ac.uk/management/research/pdf/2007-16.pdf. Date of access: 08.02.2014.
- Andreeva A. Mirovoy opyt goszakupok [World Experience of State Procurements]. Byudzhet [Budget]. 2006, no. 9. Available st: http://bujet.ru/article/2895.php. Date of access: 08.02.2014. (in Russian)
- Shumaev V.A. Sovershenstvovanie upravleniya gosudarstvennym sektorom ekonomiki s uchetom opyta zarubezhnykh stran [Improving of the State Economy Sector Management Basing on Foreign Experience]. Mekhanizatsiya stroitel’stva. [Automation of Construction]. 2013, no. 10, pp. 49—51. (in Russian)
- Balashov V.V., Fisunov K.V. Sistema monitoringa v ramkakh ekspertizy realizatsii gosudarstvennogo zakaza [Monitoring System in Frames of Public Order Implementation Examination]. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami [Management of Economic Systems]. 2012, no. 48. Available at: http://www.uecs.ru/marketing/item/1876-2012-12-25-08-50-27. Date of access: 08.02.2014. (in Russian)
- Reyting Spetsializirovannykh organizatsiy po provedeniyu torgov v sootvetstvii s zakonom o razmeshchenii zakazov za 2013 god [Rating of Specialized Organizations on Tendering According to Law on Placing of Contracts]. Available at: http://www.mosgorzakaz.ru/2013.html. Date of access: 28.04.2014. (in Russian)
- Burak P.I. Investitsionno-stroitel’nyy kompleks Moskvy v usloviyakh territorial’noy ekspansii goroda [Construction and Investment Complex of Moscow in Terms of Territorial Expansion of the City]. Ekonomika stroitel’stva [Construction Economics]. 2014, no. 1, pp. 12—25. (in Russian)
- Gur'ev V.V., Dmitriev A.N., Sichareva A.Y., Sazhneva Z.S. Ekonomiko-tekhnologicheskaya effektivnost’ stroitel’noy otrasli Moskvy [Economic and technological efficiency of the Moscow’s’ construction industry]. Promyshlennoe i grazdanskoe stroitel’stvo [Industrial and Civil Engineering]. 2014, no. 1, pp. 37—42. (in Russian)
- Goryachev I.E. O rabote assotsiatsii ekspertizy stroitel’nykh proektov v 2013 godu [On the Work of the Association of Construction Projects’ Examination in 2013]. Promyshlennoe i grazdanskoe stroitel’stvo [Industrial and Civil Engineering]. 2014, no. 4, pp. 29—33. (in Russian)
- Makushchenko M.P. Razvitie regional’nogo mekhanizma povysheniya effektivnosti ispol’zovaniya rynochnogo potentsiala stroitel’nykh predpriyatiy [Development of a Regional Mechanism for Improving the Efficiency of Construction Enterprises’ Market Potential]. Ekonomika stroitel’stva i gorodskogo hozyaystva [Economy of Construction and Municipal Services]. 2013, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 313—320. (in Russian)
- Grabovyy P.G., Bredikhin V.V., Kapyrin D.A. Problemy upravleniya proizvodstvenno-tekhnicheskim potentsialom territorial’no-investitsionnogo stroitel’nogo kompleksa (TISK) v usloviyakh konkurentnoy sredy [Management Problems of Production and Technical Potential of Spatial and Investment Construction Complex in Competitive Environment]. Nedvizhimost’: ekonomika, upravlenie [Real Estate: Economics, Management]. 2012, no. 1, pp. 47—51. (in Russian)
- Gushchin A.Yu. Opredelenie effektivnosti i sposoby ee otsenki v sisteme gosudarstvennogo zakaza [Definition of Efficiency and Methods of its Evaluation in the State Order System]. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya [Basic Research]. 2012, no. 9, part 1, pp. 204—208. (in Russian)
- Saydayev Kh.L.-A. Metodika vybora stroitel’noy kompanii v ramkakh organizatsii tendera na osnove rascheta kompleksnogo pokazatelya rezul’tativnosti [Methodology of Choosing a Construction Company for Tender on the Basis of Estimating Complex Efficiency Index]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2013, no. 10, pp. 266—271. (in Russian)