Вестник МГСУ 5/2012
  • Ivanov Andrey Vladimirovich - Member of the Yaroslavl Interregional Bar Candidate of Legal Sciences, legal counsel +7 (8485) 72-80-13, Member of the Yaroslavl Interregional Bar, 30 Ushinskogo st., Yaroslavl', 150000, Russian Federation.

Страницы 181 - 186

The author of the article argues that the Russian construction industry is in need of an effective management system. The essence of the potential management system is that the management impact, irrespective of its origin, must be recognized by individuals as a deliberate need that will bring them particular economic benefits.
Management of the construction industry as one of the most important constituents of the real economy may turn efficient in the event that it is in control of its production, real property and investment constituents in both, so to say, "horizontal" and "vertical" directions. Investment relations run through principal construction operations and any related activities; therefore, they must be represented in the functional responsibilities of the Ministry of Regional Development that is in control of the construction industry.
The construction market accommodates various legal entities. Most of them are controlled by co-owners whose work is under the control of management partners. It is essential that any economic levers that they possess are not predominant. It is vital for any decisions that they propose to be supported by other co-owners (or their majority). And this is feasible in the event of good business relations between the parties.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2012.5.181 - 186

Библиографический список
  1. Adizez I.K. Ideal’nyy rukovoditel’. Pochemu im nel’zya stat’ i chto iz etogo sleduet? [Perfect Manager. Why Is It Impossible to Become the One and What Does This Imply?] Moscow, Alpina Publ., 2010, p. 79.
  2. Andreev V.K. Sootvetstvuet li Kontseptsiya razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva po-trebnostyam rossiyskogo obshchestva? [Does the Development Concept of the Civil Legislation Meet the Needs of the Russian Society?]. Khozyaystvo i pravo [Economy and Law]. 2010, no. 4, pp. 24.
  3. Utka V.I. Doveritel’noe upravlenie nedvizhimym imushchestvom: minimizatsiya riskov vladeniya aktivami [Investment Management of Real Estate: Minimization of Risks Associated with the Process of Holding Assets]. Zakonodatel’stvo i ekonomika [Legislation and Economics]. 2009, no. 3, p. 9.
  4. Zinkovskiy A.N. Formirovanie investitsionnogo portfelya developerskikh organizatsiy [Formation of the Investment Portfolio of Development Organizations]. Ekonomika stroitel’stva [Construction Economics]. 2009, no. 1, p. 93.
  5. Livshits V., Shevtsov A. Kakikh oshibok sleduet izbegat’ pri otsenke investitsionnykh proektov s uchastiem gosudarstva? [What Mistakes Should Be Avoided in the Assessment of Investment Projects That Have a State Shareholding?] Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics]. 2011, no. 9, p. 82.
  6. Yastrebov A.V. Metodologiya strategicheskogo planirovaniya investitsionno-stroitel’noy (developerskoy) deyatel’nosti [Methodology of Strategic Planning of Investment and Construction (Development) Activities]. St.Petersburg, 2010.

Cкачать на языке оригинала


Вестник МГСУ 5/2016
  • Nidziy Elena Nikolaevna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Candidate of Economical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Economy and Management in the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; Этот e-mail адрес защищен от спам-ботов, для его просмотра у Вас должен быть включен Javascript .

Страницы 119-129

The construction industry is one of the key fund-creating industries, the formation of the Russian economy greatly depends on it. The construction sector is cyclic, that’s why it has always been sensitive to the tendencies of the national economy. In the contemporary conditions of weak economical climate the construction industry is in a state of sluggish recession. The key indicators exercising restraining influence on the construction complex are analyzed. The author carried out calculations of the prices for residential real estate in the past years. The author’s view on the near-term prospects on the exit from recession state is formulated. From the view of the today’s state and the nearest development prospects, it can be stated that the construction industry is one of the most problematic among the basic economic sectors. Retrieval of the expansion rate of the construction industry is possible in case of the positive changes of general economic state.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.5.119-129

Библиографический список
  1. Abramov R.A. K voprosu ob otsenke roli gosudarstva v protsesse razvitiya rynochnoy ekonomiki [To the Problem of Assessing the State Role in the Process of Market Economy Development]. Voprosy upravleniya [Management Issues]. 2014, no. 3, pp. 59—63. (In Russian)
  2. Arsent’eva Yu.A., Baulina O.A., Gavrilko L.V. Perspektivy razvitiya stroitel’noy otrasli v usloviyakh krizisa [Prospects of Construction Industry Development in Crisis Conditions]. NovaInfo.Ru. 2015, no. 33-1, article 11. Available at: Date of access: 02.04.2016. (In Russian)
  3. Efremova V.V., Koroleva A.M. Finansovaya gramotnost’ naseleniya Rossii: problemy i napravleniya povysheniya [Financial Awareness of Russian Citizens: Problems and Directions of Increase]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo [Economy and Entrepreneurship]. 2015, no. 1 (54), pp. 95—97. (In Russian)
  4. Silka D.N. Mechanisms to Actuate Growth Drivers in Conditions of Stagnation of Russian Economy. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2014, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 148—150. DOI: (In Russian)
  5. Rossiyskiy statisticheskiy ezhegodnik [Russian Statistical Yearbook]. 2015, Moscow, 2015, 728 p. (In Russian)
  6. Yas’kova N.Yu. Tendentsii razvitiya stroitel’nykh korporatsiy v novykh usloviyakh [Development Trends of Construction Enterprises in New Conditions]. Nauchnoe obozrenie [Scientific Review]. 2013, no. 6, pp. 174—178. (In Russian)
  7. Fedotova M.A., Sternik G.M. Rynok zhil’ya gorodov Rossii v 2014-2015 godu: turbulentnost’, perekhodyashchaya v retsessiyu [Housing Market of Russian Cities in 2014-2015: Turbulence Transforming into Recession]. Ekspert online [Expert Online]. 23.07.2015. Available at: Date of access: 27.03.2016. (In Russian)
  8. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Federal’noy sluzhby gosudarstvennoy registratsii, kadastra i kartografii «Rosreestr» [Official Website of Federal Service for Public Registration, Cadastre and Mapping “Roseestr”]. Available at: Date of access: 02.03.2016. (In Russian)
  9. Alpatskaya I.E. Razvitie mekhanizma realizatsii sotsial’nykh zhilishchnykh programm [Development of the Implementation Mechanism of Social Housing Programs]. Mikroekonomika [Microeconomy]. 2011, no. 6, pp. 166—168. (In Russian)
  10. Litvinova S.A. Rol’ ipoteki v preodolenii krizisnykh yavleniy v ekonomike [The Role of Mortgage in Overcoming the Crisis Phenomena in the Economy]. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki [Problems of Modern Economy]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 242—245. (In Russian)
  11. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Agentstva po ipotechnomu zhilishchnomu kreditovaniyu [Official Website of Housing Mortgage Finance Agency]. Available at: Date of access: 30.03.2016. (In Russian)
  12. Koroleva A.M. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya rynka ipotechnogo kreditovaniya v Rossii [Contemporary State and Development Prospects of Mortgage Market Development in Russia]. Munitsipal’naya ekonomika i upravlenie [Municipal Economy and Management]. 2015, no. 2, pp. 116—121. (In Russian)
  13. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Reytingovogo agentstva stroitel’nogo kompleksa [Official Website of Rating Agency of the Construction Complex]. Available at: Date of access: 29.03.2016. (In Russian)
  14. Pershina T.A. Povyshenie energoeffektivnosti deyatel’nosti predpriyatiy stroitel’nogo kompleksa [Raising Energy Efficiency of the Operation of Construction Complex Enterprises]. Nauchnye trudy SWorld [Scientific Works of SWorld]. 2011, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 78—82. (In Russian)
  15. Yas’kova N.Yu. Perspektivy razvitiya stroitel’stva v otraslevom formate [Development Prospects of the Construction Industry in the Branch Form]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Irkutsk State Technical University]. Irkutsk, 2014, no. 2 (85), pp. 233—236. (In Russian)
  16. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Tsentral’nogo banka Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Official Website of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation]. Available at: Date of access: 31.03.2016. (In Russian)
  17. Silka D.N. On Priority Measures for Creating the Basis for the Development of the Russian Economy. Life Science Journal. 2014, vol. 11, no.7s, pp. 310—313.
  18. Kolmykova T.S. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskiy mekhanizm strukturnykh preobrazovaniy ekonomiki [Organizational and Economical Mechanism of Structural Transformations in the Economy]. Kursk, 2010, 200 p. (In Russian)
  19. Belyaev M.K., Sokolova S.A. Vliyanie realizatsii krupnykh stroitel’nykh proektov na sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie rezul’taty regiona [Influence of Major Construction Projects Implementation on Social and Economical Results of the Region]. Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniya [Humanities Scientific Researches]. 2014, no. 11 (39), pp. 215—221. (In Russian)
  20. Selyakhina E.S. Deyatel’nost’ organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti v sfere rossiyskogo zhilishchnogo rynka v usloviyakh mirovogo finansovo-ekonomicheskogo krizisa [Activity of Government Authorities in the Sphere of Russian Residential Market in the Conditions of World Financial and Economic Crisis]. EGO: Ekonomika. Gosudarstvo. Obshchestvo [The Economy. The State. Society]. 2011, no. 1, article. 2. Available at: Date of access: 03.04.2016. (In Russian)

Скачать статью

Status and prospects of designing the virtual organizational structuresof construction companies

Вестник МГСУ 11/2013
  • Bolshakov Sergey Nikolaevich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) postgraduate student, Assistant, Department of Information Systems, Technology and Automation in Civil Engineering, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; Этот e-mail адрес защищен от спам-ботов, для его просмотра у Вас должен быть включен Javascript .
  • Volkov Andrey Anatol’evich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Rector, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Chair, Department of Information Systems, Technology and Automation in Civil Engineering, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; +7 (499) 929-52-29; Этот e-mail адрес защищен от спам-ботов, для его просмотра у Вас должен быть включен Javascript .

Страницы 218-225

This article examines the current state of virtual organizational structures. The processes accompanying introduction of these technologies into the production environment are defined. For better disclosure of the semantic content of virtual technology their historical development and the main stages of formation are analyzed.At first there were more than enough obstacles to the development of virtual organizational structures, such as lack of fully formed legal framework, which should act as a guarantor of transparency and legitimacy for all the counterparties of virtual enterprise. Virtual organizational structures appeared abroad. Today they are increasingly penetrating the Russian market. It occurs within the framework of representative offices and branches of foreign companies, and in the structures of domestic enterprises. Increase in operation life of virtual enterprises without time binding to a specific project, creation of new forms and variations, expanding of the range of problems solved by means of new organizational forms, in other words, embrace of other sectors of the economy, cost optimization and simplification of creation and adaptation of virtual enterprises — these and many other issues need to be solved as part of the specified subject area and can serve as a basis for further research.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2013.11.218-225

Библиографический список
  1. Radugin A.A. Osnovy menedzhmenta [Principles of Management]. Moscow, 2006.
  2. Serdyuk V.A. Setevye i virtual'nye organizatsii: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya [Network and Virtual Organizations: State and Prospects of Development]. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom [Management in Russia and Abroad]. 2002, no. 5, pð. 91—104.
  3. Volkov A.A. Virtual'nyy informatsionnyy ofis stroitel'noy organizatsii [Virtual Information Office of a Building Company]. Stroitel'nye materialy, oborudovanie, tekhnologii XXI veka [Building Materials, Equipment, Technologies of the 21st century]. 2002, no. 2, pp. 28—29.
  4. Losev K.Yu., Losev Yu.G., Volkov A.A. Razvitie modeley predmetnoy oblasti stroitel'noy sistemy v protsesse razrabotki informatsionnoy podderzhki proektirovaniya [Building System Subject Area Development During the Process of Design-cals-system Work out]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2011, no. 1, vol. 1, pp. 352—357.
  5. Elenin A., Ponomarev I. Virtual'nye korporatsii [Virtual Corporations]. Moscow, 2001.
  6. Volkov A.A., Lebedev V.M. Proektirovanie sistemokvantov rabochikh operatsiy i trudovykh stroitel'nykh protsessov v srede informatsionnykh tekhnologiy [Designing of the System Quanta of Working Operations and Labor Building Processes in the IT environment]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 293—296.
  7. Volkov A.A. Sovremennye i perspektivnye informatsionnye tekhnologii v stroitel'stve [Modern and prospective information technologies in construction]. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo [Industrial and Civil Engineering]. 2012, no. 9, pp. 5—6.
  8. Volkov A.A., Lebedev V.M. Modelirovanie sistemokvantov stroitel'nykh protsessov i ob"ektov [Modeling of System Quanta of Construction Processes and Projects]. Vestnik BGTU im. V.G. Shukhova [Proceedings of Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G.Shukhov]. 2008, no. 2, pp. 293—296.
  9. Asaul A.N. Fenomen investitsionno-stroitel'nogo kompleksa ili kak sokhranyaetsya stroitel'nyy kompleks strany v rynochnoy ekonomike: monografiya [Phenomenon of Construction Complex Investment or how does the Construction Complex of the Country Maintain in the Market Economy]. 2001. Available at: Date of access: 16.10.2013.
  10. Volkov A.A. Ekonomicheskiy analiz tekhnicheskikh i tekhnologicheskikh innovatsiy v stroitel'stve [Economic Analysis of Technical and Technological Innovations in Construction]. Stroitel'nye materialy, oborudovanie, tekhnologii XXI veka [Building Materials, Equipment, Technologies of the 21st century]. 2005, no. 12, p. 54.
  11. Volkov A.A., Yarulin R.N. Avtomatizatsiya proektirovaniya proizvodstva remontnykh rabot zdaniy i inzhenernoy infrastruktury [Computer-Aided Design of Repairs of Buildings and the Engineering Infrastructure]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2012, no. 9, pp. 234—240.

Cкачать на языке оригинала


Вестник МГСУ 10/2012
  • Subbotin Artem Sergeevich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) postgraduate student, Department of Technology, Organization and Management in Construction Industry, Assistant Lecturer, Department of Architectural and Structural Design, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; Этот e-mail адрес защищен от спам-ботов, для его просмотра у Вас должен быть включен Javascript .
  • Sborshikov Sergey Borisovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Professor, Department of Technology, Organization and Management in the Construction Industry, 8 (495) 583-47-52, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; Этот e-mail адрес защищен от спам-ботов, для его просмотра у Вас должен быть включен Javascript .

Страницы 267 - 271

The authors argue that successful development and implementation of major infrastructural projects require special arrangements between the government authorities and the private sector. The authors have developed their proposals concerning models of interaction and strengths of the above arrangements that apply to the organizational structure of the management of infrastructural projects as a step towards the formation of an advanced and progressive model of interaction between public and private sectors. Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is the model in question.
Great Britain is the pioneer of the public private partnership model that was later picked up in the USA, Canada, Australia and the EU constituent states.
PPP and the construction industry have strong links in terms of the involvement of the private sector in the resolution of public problems of the urban infrastructure, namely, restructuring of airfields, railways, public healthcare facilities, kindergartens, schools, etc.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2012.10.267 - 271

Библиографический список
  1. Subbotin A.S. O vozmozhnosti ispol’zovaniya klasternoy modeli chastno-gosudarstvennogo partnerstva v ramkakh stroitel’noy otrasli [Prospects for the Implementation of the Cluster Model of the Public Private Partnership in the Construction Industry]. International Scientific Conference “Integration, Partnership, and Innovations in Civil Engineering Sciences and Education”. Collection of works of the international conference. 2011, Moscow, MGSU Publ., vol. 2, pp. 547—548.
  2. Sborshchikov S.B. Teoreticheskie zakonomernosti i osobennosti organizatsii vozdeystviy na investitsionno-stroitel’nuyu deyatel’nost’ [Theoretical Patterns and Peculiarities of Organization of Influence on Investment Operations in the Construction Industry]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2009, no. 2, pp. 183—187.
  3. Deryabina M.A. “Theoretical and Practical Problems of Public and Private Partnership”. Report made at the section of the meeting of the academic council of the school of theoretical economics. Available at: Date of access: 03.05.2012.
  4. Varnavskiy V.G. Partnerstvo gosudarstva i chastnogo sektora: formy, proekty, riski [Partnership between the State and the Private Sector: Forms, Projects, Risks]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2005, pp. 28—36.
  5. Likhachev V.N., Azanov M.V. Prakticheskiy analiz sovremennykh mekhanizmov gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v zarubezhnykh stranakh, ili kak realizovat’ GChP v Rossii [Practical Analysis of Modern Mechanisms of the Public Private Partnership in Foreign Countries or How to Implement PPP in Russia]. Finansy, ekonomika, bezopasnost’ [Finance, Economy, Security]. 2005, no. 1(6), pp. 2—8.
  6. Linev I.V. Kontsessiya kak forma gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva [Concession as the Form of Public Private Partnership]. Vestnik AGTU. Seriya: ekonomika. [Proceedings of Astrakhan State University of Technology. Economics Series]. 2011, no. 2, pp. 49—54.
  7. Amunts D.M. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo. Kontsessionnaya model’ sovmestnogo uchastiya gosudarstva i chastnogo sektora v realizatsii fi nansovoemkikh proektov [Public Private Partnership. Concession Model of Joint Involvement of Public and Private Sectors in the Implementation of Capital-intensive Projects]. Spravochnik rukovoditelya uchrezhdeniya kul’tury [Reference Book for Top Managers of Institutions of Culture]. 2005, no. 12, pp. 16—24.
  8. Lityushkin V.V. Ekonomicheskie aspekty bezopasnogo infrastrukturnogo zhizneobespecheniya [Economic Aspects of Safe Infrastructure]. Stavropol State University Publ., 2010, 172 p.
  9. Belitskaya A.V. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo: ponyatie, soderzhanie, pravovoe regulirovanie [Public Private Partnership: Concept, Maintenance, Legal Framework]. Lomonosov Moscow State University Publ., 2011.

Cкачать на языке оригинала

Результаты 1 - 4 из 4